:) No worries, heretic. I was replying to Om. Fran has already determined that Om is a virulent anti-atheist, which is certainly his right to be, and participate, so long as he follows the posting guidelines we all do.
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 1:15 PM, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > Chris I think it is time for me to not reply, > Allan > > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Chris Jenkins < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> You speak from a position of authority, of gnosis, and yet on what do >> you base this knowledge? Let me rephrase this for you and see if it >> illustrates the conundrum in your position: >> >> Those who believe in Chakras are not aware of the Truth of the Holy Pink >> Unicorn. They, like animals, have some awareness of the world around them, >> but do not recognize the simple fact of her invisible and omnipotent hooves. >> Their consciousness is deadened to her benevolence, and the wisdom granted >> in each of the hairs of her holy mane. >> >> Does my assertion have any more value than yours, any more quality? Is >> there some measure of validity by which faith can be tested, when empiricism >> and rationalism are taken off the table? >> >> >> . > > > > -- > ( > ) > I_D Allan > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
