Not to mention Tweeter as well.  Video and camera's on cell phones
with internet access are a wonderful medium for freedom.  Frankly, I'm
amazed totalitarian regimes allow their citizens to own them.

To illustrate how my mind works, I thought this thread was going to be
about beer.  Ah well.

dj


On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:32 PM, frantheman<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Jürgen Habermas is 80 today. He is one of the most influential
> contemporary thinkers in the areas of philosophy, sociology and
> cultural science:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habermas,_Jürgen
>
> One of his most interesting works is "The Theory of Communicative
> Action." I find his analysis of the development of contemporary
> society interesting, particularly his analysis of the way modern
> society can be seen as an unequal dialectic between private,
> subjective "lifeworlds" and an ever more powerful "system." His
> thinking in this area is useful because it offers an explanation for
> some trends we observe in contemporary society, for example, our
> suspicions that we are being ever more disenfranchised, although,
> formally, we live in societies in which participation, representation
> and equality are established. Habermas sees the "system" as taking
> overweening power and thus becoming a source of alienation in the
> areas of the welfare state, corporate capitalism and the culture of
> mass consumption. The mass media plays a major role in this process.
> Political parties are also part of this "system."
>
> The following passage is lifted from Wikipedia (the quotations are
> from TCA):
>
> "In the end, systemic mechanisms suppress forms of social integration
> even in those areas where a consensus dependent co-ordination of
> action cannot be replaced, that is, where the symbolic reproduction of
> the lifeworld is at stake. In these areas, the mediatization of the
> lifeworld assumes the form of colonisation".
> Habermas argues that Horkheimer and Adorno, like Weber before them,
> confused system rationality with action rationality. This prevented
> them dissecting the effects of the intrusion of steering media into a
> differentiated lifeworld and the rationalisation of action
> orientations that follows. They could then only identify spontaneous
> communicative actions within areas of apparently 'non-rational'
> action, art and love on the one hand or the charisma of the leader on
> the other, as having any value.
> According to Habermas, lifeworlds become colonised by steering media
> when four things happen:
> 1. Traditional forms of life are dismantled.
> 2. Social roles are sufficiently differentiated.
> 3. There are adequate rewards of leisure and money for the alienated
> labour.
> 4. Hopes and dreams become individuated by state canalization of
> welfare and culture.
> These processses are institutionalised by developing global systems of
> jurisprudence. He here indicates the limits of an entirely juridified
> concept of legitimation and practically calls for more anarchistic
> 'will formation' by autonomous networks and groups.
> "Counterinstitutions are intended to dedifferentiate some parts of the
> formally organised domains of action, remove them from the clutches of
> the steering media, and return these 'liberated areas' to the action
> co-ordinating medium of reaching understanding".
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_Communicative_Action
>
> I wonder how much the Internet (I'm thinking here of the burgeoning
> social networks like Facebook, as well as - in a very modest way - our
> group here and others like them, but also Wikipedia, search engines,
> etc.) are such "counterinstitutions." Certainly the nervous actions of
> the regimes in China and Iran in recent times would seem to reinforce
> such views.
>
> Francis
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to