You support her "no matter what her choice is".  Suppose she chooses
abortion for sex-selection: she wants a boy, tests show her little one
is a girl, so she aborts. Would you support her choice?

On Jul 4, 8:43 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> Don I know the logic is faulty, the problem is it is more true than I would
> like to amit,, to quote mey sister who is staunchly anti abortion..  "I can
> only support one issue at a time."
> Personally I am for the womans right to chose and I will support her no
> matter what her choice is.
>
> As for no good loser parents go, I do know parents that have sold everything
> they had to take care of family, and we are talking in excess of
> $2,500,000.oo paying medical bills, ending up getting assistance to keep the
> family alive...  talk about loser parents ,, they lost everything.
> I think it is called greed.
> Allan
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > There is faulty logic here.  You are assuming that if one opposes
> > abortion then one also opposes feeding starving children.  These are
> > not mutually exclusive ideals.  Far from it in fact.  What I see
> > happening is some conservatives believe people should take
> > responsibility for their children.  Wither that is in the womb or at
> > home making sure they get enough to eat.  If the kids are coming to
> > school starving then CPS takes them away from their no good piece of
> > garbage useless parents.  The kids get fed and get out from under
> > their loser parents.  Everybody wins.
>
> > It would be like me saying since you(example here, keep pantyhose on)
> > favor abortion then you must want to murder all hungry children.  See,
> > makes no since whatsoever.
>
> > For the record,  I think women should be in control of their own
> > bodies.  I also think they should do it without tax payer money.  So
> > I'm pro-choice, anti-enable.  Lunch at my kids school is a buck 75.
> > If their parents can't afford that on their welfare checks something
> > is very, very hinky and CPS should be involved.
>
> > dj
>
> > On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 2:16 AM, iam deheretic<[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Those that are anti abortion and don't rant on about the starving
> > children.
> > > that is very easy to explain. abortion they can rant about and it cost
> > them
> > > very little, maybe a small donation and a little time,  now starving
> > > children on the other hand takes a major commitment and to do it would
> > > require a major out lay of cash. as well as a major outlay of time.. so
> > the
> > > out lay of money and time are the major factors in the choice of what to
> > > support.
> > > Allan
>
> > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 8:50 PM, retiredjim34 <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > >> Lee - an interesting thread; thanks for initiating it.
> > >>     Many have tried to understand why there is evil in this world,
> > >> How can it be reconciled with an all powerful, all good God. In all
> > >> cases known to me the reasoning looks at the question from afar, much
> > >> as another god might look at it. The answer usually begins by setting
> > >> up a continuum such as murder to injury to no harm, and labels one end
> > >> of the continuum evil. It then struggles with reconciling the
> > >> continuum, or at least an end of it, with an omniscient God.
> > >>     What I proposed as a definition of evil proceeds from within,
> > >> from the effect the evil has on those involved with it. Thus, I
> > >> proposed that an evil act is one that drives us together, one that
> > >> makes us desperate for the comfort of other human beings. Doing this I
> > >> believe presents a fair description of the effect of evil, while at
> > >> the same time revealing the reason for evil - to make us desperate for
> > >> the comfort of others. Of course I don't think that to be bad - I
> > >> didn't label the evil and good definitions I proposed as either
> > >> yeilding good or bad results. (But I do think that in the sense I
> > >> propose evil has a good effect and the result of good as I define it
> > >> is bad  - which of course is contra to what most of the others in this
> > >> thread seem to think.)
> > >>     Again, how's that for strange?  Jim
>
> > >> On Jul 1, 2:41 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > That's the point Jim.  In all of the examples you listed it is pretty
> > >> > much understood by the majority that these acts are considered not
> > >> > good.  Yes of course such acts do come under normal human behavoiur
> > >> > but only in so much as normal humans have commited such acs.  However
> > >> > if we consider what is normal to be what the majority agree's then
> > >> > murder is not as normal as it would seem.
>
> > >> > Indeed I must confess that part of my reason for creating this thread
> > >> > is to try to understand the argument against a creator God for the
> > >> > reason of the existance of evil.
>
> > >> > I'm still nto getting it though.  Why is it a bad thing that we seek
> > >> > out the company of each other?  Also to do so does not necisarily mean
> > >> > that we are not competent on our own, without others of our species to
> > >> > help.
>
> > >> > On 30 June, 10:54, retiredjim34 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > > Lee - thanks for considering my proposed definition. You ask: How
> > can
> > >> > > normal human behavior be defined as evil? I suspect that it largely
> > is
> > >> > > a matter of viewpoint. Surely the KKK didn't consider lynching
> > negroes
> > >> > > evil; Nor did Hitler consider the holocaust evil, or the Romans
> > >> > > crucifiction of the Christians, or maybe even a mother's murder of a
> > >> > > molester of her child. I expect you have heard of the theodicy
> > >> > > problem: given an all powerful, all good God, why does evil exist in
> > >> > > this world? Many have proposed their answer to this question. The
> > >> > > answers are summarized in Philosophies for Dummies - 1. All evil is
> > >> > > punishment for sin. 2. All evil results from the misuse of free
> > will.
> > >> > > 3. Evil requires a moral choice which leads to soul building. 4.
> > Some
> > >> > > combination of 1-3.
> > >> > >     Instead of these views of evil from afar, I propose a view of
> > evil
> > >> > > from within the moment. It's purpose and function is to bring us
> > >> > > together. In that sense it is an antidote to good, which as I said
> > >> > > tends to let us think that we've got it made and need no one. Aren't
> > >> > > these responses to good and evil the normal human responses.? I
> > think
> > >> > > so. How's that for strange?
>
> > >> > > On Jun 29, 2:49 am, "[email protected]" <
> > [email protected]>
> > >> > > wrote:
>
> > >> > > > That's a strange way of seeing it Jim.
>
> > >> > > > I would think that as our speices is undeniably social then
> > >> > > > incorperated in the norm is the need for human contact, as such
> > how
> > >> > > > can what can only be considered normal behavour stand up to being
> > >> > > > defined as evil?
>
> > >> > > > On 27 June, 22:01, retiredjim34 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > > > > How about this as an answer? Evil is whatever brings us
> > together,
> > >> > > > > makes us desparate for the comfort of one another, while good is
> > >> > > > > all
> > >> > > > > that makes us think we are independent, don't need anyone, have
> > >> > > > > things
> > >> > > > > nailed, are the very best and can do anything we want. Or is
> > that
> > >> > > > > too
> > >> > > > > simple an answer?
>
> > >> > > > > On Jun 24, 1:51 am, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > > > > > A simple question, or is it?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > >> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > >> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > >> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > >> > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > --
> > > (
> > >  )
> > > I_D Allan
>
> --
> (
>  )
> I_D Allan
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to