Throughout MJ's popularity I fairly much ignored him but that was
primarily due to my general anti-popularity bent.  Usually in later
years I come to see some of the artist, the art and the creation in
the work of those I've previously ignored for being popular --
however, I've yet to see the talent in a few of them such as Monroe.
Presley, well, I've seen him out of the spotlight and he every bit
lived up to that sneer he used so often in his act that I still fail
to appreciate his art as fully as I might.  Sometimes it's better if
the audience, the consumer of art, not see the artist offstage.  But
for a few rare occasions it always takes something away from their art

Such as it was for me and not only M but his entire clan which
notwithstanding the actual talent existing therein to me is just bad
circus.  Crass exploitation of family by family even unto death and
beyond.  I feel assured M's name will ring cash registers possibly
even greater in death than he did in life.  This should all be behind
a curtain as should the disgusting display over it by that portion of
the general public who buy into it.  The media are merely taking
professional advantage of the production staged for them and M's
daughter will live that for the rest of her life.

These outcries of alleged deep felt grief we witness even with our
eyes and ears held shut against them are an embarrassing and pathetic
display of severely misplaced concern.  I want to shake these
slavering sycophants and yell at them ... my god people, we're in the
midst of some serious changes in our society, in our economy, in our
government but it takes the death of an ice cream icon to get you
moving and involved?

Yet on the other hand perhaps this display is providing nothing more
than an outlet, an escape valve, for the pressure a lot of society is
feeling and perhaps doesn't know how to otherwise release.  But I have
to say that it seems all out of proportion.  I don't think the death
of a great leader of state would generate this much coverage and
response, nor that of a renowned scientist nor any other figure that
comes to mind.  It's just out of proportion.  Perhaps something deeper
is amiss.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to