Hey, didn't ya'll limeys actually hang a monkey once?

http://www.thisishartlepool.co.uk/history/thehartlepoolmonkey.asp

dj


On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:17 AM, archytas<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Have to agree with Don on academics.  Worse, we have given up notions
> of wisdom in favour of fact regurgitation just as the Internet, for
> all its faults, allows this to anyone who can keyboard.  As Slip and
> others have become aware, my keyboard has now replaced my mind and
> relieved me entirely from the tyranny of wisdom.  Equipped with
> chained monekys (surely if we can text we can converse in typo?) I
> shall enter the lists of politics secure in the permanent excuse that
> I can never lie and only be accused of singing from the wrong
> hymnkeboard and offer up the odd monkey for hanging when its policies
> fail.
>
> On 13 July, 09:56, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I mentioned the case of Nico Bento in another thread.  My academic
>> career is over and I'm hoping to get on with something worthwhile.  I
>> feel wisdom has deserted the system of our society almost entirely and
>> that we might glean some understanding of what wisdom might be by
>> looking at what it clearly isn't in practice.  One of the categories
>> I'm looking at is miscarriages of justice.
>>
>> Nico Bento is a Portuguese man living in England.  He was convicted of
>> the murder of his girlfriend four years ago and is now a free man.
>> She drowned in a lake and was a Polish woman of 26.  The most
>> interesting facts are these:
>>
>> 1. There was no forensic evidence of murder.  She was not strangled,
>> there were no signs of any struggle and her clothes were neatly piled
>> up on the lakeside, causing a passer-by to phone police.
>> 2. Bento called police to report her missing and try to get them to do
>> something.
>> 3. Her white handbag with a shoulder strap was in Bento's flat.
>> 4. She was depressive, working as a cleaner and had given up her
>> college course.
>> 5. There is CCTV footage of her walking along the river footpath
>> towards the lake just before she died.  No one is with her, and to the
>> layman's eye it is obvious she is not carrying the said bag.  This has
>> been shown on the BBC Newsnight programme.  I could not see the bag.
>> 6. Bedfordshire Police and the Crown Prosecution Service produced an
>> expert witness, Casey Cordell from Los Angeles tom prove she was
>> carrying the white bag in the CCTV footage.  He said it could be
>> evidenced from a shadow on the ground.
>> 7.  Bento was convicted on the grounds that the bag was in his flat
>> and the implication he must have been at the scene of the death and
>> carried it back.
>> 8.  British forensic scientists, including John Kennedy, then of our
>> official Forensic Science Service, a world-renowned expert all
>> concluded there was no evidence of the bag in the CCTV footage.  This
>> evidence was not disclosed to the defence and suppressed at the trial.
>> 9.  Cordell, the US "expert" was a known fantacist  and has since
>> topped himself.  When asked to write-up his findings by other experts
>> he clammed-up and tried to character assassinate other experts.
>> 10.  A reconstruction clearly demonstrates the "shadow" of the bag
>> claimed by Cordell is present without the bag being carried (it's of a
>> park bench) and the bag can be clearly seen in footage from the same
>> camera in similar conditions anyway.  The CCTV footage of the night in
>> question is actually evidence of the non-presence of the bag.
>> 11.  There is substantial evidence of a suicide risk despite police
>> ruling this out.
>> 12.  There is no real evidence at all against Bento.  What should have
>> been evidence of the eye in his support was turned, perversely, to
>> evidence against him, cops and prosecutors choosing to bend the case
>> against him.
>>
>> We not only convicted an innocent man, but persist in covering-up the
>> miscarriage of justice.  Kennedy is subject to a 'gagging order'.
>> Cops claim the reconstruction is 'bollocks'.  There is no explanation
>> of why vital evidence was not disclosed to the defence or why the
>> defence was so bad.  In short, all the evidence in this case
>> demonstrates a massive cock-up and a conspiracy to pervert the course
>> of justice (even if a conspiracy of idiots) that should have been
>> prevented by fair play and adherence to the rules.  Murder enquiries
>> of this kind usually involve a designated police officer handling
>> 'disclosure'.  It should be utterly impossible to suppress evidence
>> relevant to the defence.  There is a long history of similar cases,
>> including utterly fatuous 'ritual abuse' cases and dismal police
>> actions against 'terrorists' (classic ones of 'being Irish in the
>> wrong place' and 'shooting innocent Brazilians').
>>
>> What I believe cases like this exemplify is a lack of wisdom and
>> integrity and the presence of some kind of 'dirty hands philosophy'
>> used to justify what is, in fact, an idiot ideology of power.  I fear,
>> perhaps at the extreme, that this is "why" we are in Iraq and
>> Afghanistan and even that some "nightmare tyranny" is involved.  It is
>> as though we dare not put the facts to public scrutiny and must
>> instead present a skewed case because the crooks and "evil" will
>> somehow triumph if "we" try to use open means and do not match their
>> secret cunning with ours.  Virtue somehow becomes an 'idiot ploy'.
>>
>> What we need is for our system to be open to clear and patient public
>> scrutiny in order that we can act in trust.  However difficult these
>> matters are, what is clear is that this is precisely what we don't
>> do.  I suggest wisdom has lapsed to Machiavelli with the sad rider
>> that even he might well have been a satirist trying to open up dark
>> practices to public scrutiny.
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to