You're fine, BB. Chazwinian refers to Chazwin, a former poster here who was banned for constantly personally attacking everyone to whom he responded to if he disagreed with them.
Mod God refers to the Admins here. Gabby writes as though she has a persecution complex, and feels that the Mods here abuse their powers endlessly, banning people willy nilly, censoring your every word and thought in our endless quest towards jackbooted supremacy. I'm not sure if she actually thinks this, and truly thinks Chaz was unfairly banned, or if this is her own little endlessly played out joke, but you'll find that we tend to go a looooong way towards erring on the side of freedom of speech before a ban comes down. Our posting guidelines are clearly published and stated, and abiding by them hasn't posed any difficulties for the vast majority of our membership, even Gabs. Oh, and don't let her scare you away either. She's our resident gadfly, much belover for her ability to keep us on our toes, and provide an often extremely abstract perspective. On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 4:58 PM, BB47 <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am rather new here. I Googled "chazwenian" .. nothing. Which is > odd. I am not the sharpest tool in the shed by far gabby, and I don't > have a clue about anything you said. Not the mod god, none of it. > Please don't virtually kill me? Was I uncool here? > > I can't watch out for what I am going to say anyway. The guards are > on the take and the fox is watching the hen house... over? > > On Jul 30, 1:21 pm, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > Trouble is, even a single mod god isn't consistent within himself. > > Watch out what you are going to say, you have got chazwenian > > potential. And when the mod gang didn't know how to handle him they > > virtually killed him. > > > > Just a friendly advice to always stay cool here. :-) > > > > On 30 Jul., 21:57, BB47 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Jul 30, 1:44 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > Well it tells me that you have a problem with one concept of God, umm > > > > perhaps the Christian one? > > > > > You mean I didn't state that yet? Yes, I have a problem with the > > > Christian god. But I also have problems with every other god so far. > > > I am trying to find one that makes sense. I would like one, that > > > could explain all this, but I cannot find even a concept of an > > > interactive god that either makes sense or is consistent with the > > > evidence we can see on earth. > > > > > > On 27 July, 22:33, BB47 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 27, 3:38 am, "[email protected]" < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hey BB47, > > > > > > > > Welcome to ya. > > > > > > > > Now your words seem like a challange to me, and I'm always up for > > > > > > that. Tell me what is it about God that we should not get you > > > > > > started on then? > > > > > > > His personality for openers. Does god have a personality? (I > think > > > > > any "display" of behaviors, designs, what is not done, can be > cobbled > > > > > into a personality don't you think? > > > > > > > Oh, and anybody who believes in the fossil record can clearly see > that > > > > > species arrive and dissapear, obviously not "created" at the same > > > > > time. Hmmmm...what does that say to you?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
