Answers interspersed below... On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:32 PM, BB47 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Well my sense of humor seems to get me in trouble most often. > especially since emoticons are against my religion. Religion's against mine. ;) > I read the guidelines carefully, and I am a little concerned about the > vague definition of "attack." I know all the obvious ones, Ad > Hominem, name calling, ect. but what about sarcasm? Mine comes out > of my pores at times. Defining a limit on that is difficult. I am > going to make a real effort to behave myself and be respectable > however I think we're all big enough around here to deal with sarcasm. Our general rule of thumb is attack the idea, not the person. Although Lee's kind of an idiot. > Ah...yes, and fine gods they are! > Oh, hell no. Please don't get that impression. We're overworked, underpaid, with crammed full personal lives, and an educational level from no college to professor. We do, however, filter just about 100% of the spam, read every post, and do our best to keep it fair and fun. > My favorite movies have quirky characters. This group has some great > ones. Glad to have you on board. > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
