Seems funny that in one sentence someone can claim not be believe in "intellectual superiority", and in the next instance state that "You don't understand what I do know. I do understand everything that you know". What am I missing?
On Aug 8, 9:39 pm, Tinker tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > You didn't answer my question Fran. > We've discussed 'intellectual superiority'. It doesn't exist as far as I'm > concerned. > You don't understand what I do know. > I do understand everything that you know :-) > > peace & Love > > > > > > > Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 01:03:13 -0700 > > Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: evolution > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > > On 8 Aug., 00:50, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > It seems to me that you are presenting the Idea that it is OK for one > > > who is intellectually superior to ad hominem subversively when they > > > cannot refute the ideas of the one they would be attacking with the > > > intellectual superiority. > > > 1.) The idea of intellectual superiority vs. inferiority sees to be an > > issue for you, Tinker. What is your understanding of the term > > "intellectual superiority"? > > > 2.) "... to ad hominen ... when they cannot refute ... " It doesn't > > have to be an "either/or" thing, it can also be an "and/as well as"! > > _________________________________________________________________ > With Windows Live, you can organize, edit, and share your > photos.http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/products/phot...- > Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
