I was thinking that same thing Tinker, why don't you try to understand instead of finding something to pick at. Obviously you don't understand what is being said. Now I'd be willing to help you understand if you could simply explain what you don't understand about intellectual superiority. You are very adept at misinterpretation so I'm just trying to help here. If you could just grasp the simpleness of it.
On Aug 10, 6:01 pm, Tinker tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > "We've discussed 'intellectual superiority'. It doesn't exist as far as I'm > concerned." - tink > > My friend, you should look to understand, rather than look for something to > pick at. > " as far as I'm concerned" was relative to; "We've discussed 'intellectual > superiority'". > Meaning; "he is not intellectually superior to me". > I hope that helps you understand what was said. > > peace & Love > > > > > Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:30:11 -0700 > > Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: evolution > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > > Seems funny that in one sentence someone can claim not be believe in > > "intellectual superiority", and in the next instance state that "You > > don't understand what I do know. I do understand everything that you > > know". What am I missing? > > > On Aug 8, 9:39 pm, Tinker tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > You didn't answer my question Fran. > > > We've discussed 'intellectual superiority'. It doesn't exist as far as > > > I'm concerned. > > > You don't understand what I do know. > > > I do understand everything that you know :-) > > > > peace & Love > > > > > Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 01:03:13 -0700 > > > > Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: evolution > > > > From: [email protected] > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > On 8 Aug., 00:50, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > It seems to me that you are presenting the Idea that it is OK for one > > > > > who is intellectually superior to ad hominem subversively when they > > > > > cannot refute the ideas of the one they would be attacking with the > > > > > intellectual superiority. > > > > > 1.) The idea of intellectual superiority vs. inferiority sees to be an > > > > issue for you, Tinker. What is your understanding of the term > > > > "intellectual superiority"? > > > > > 2.) "... to ad hominen ... when they cannot refute ... " It doesn't > > > > have to be an "either/or" thing, it can also be an "and/as well as"! > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > With Windows Live, you can organize, edit, and share your > > > photos.http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/products/phot...Hide > > > quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > _________________________________________________________________ > With Windows Live, you can organize, edit, and share your > photos.http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/products/phot... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
