Indeed we all think we are correct, and a good thing too, or where
would we be with the inability to make up our minds?

On 8 Aug, 02:45, Tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
> I definitely did not mean to imply that was the circumstance in any
> 'present' situation.
> To get the gist of the point of view, change humble to honest  or
> honorable.
> Devils advocating your comment, "something so bad". It could happen.
> It's also possible that not doing it could get you called arrogant :-)
>
> peace & Love
>
> On Aug 7, 4:29 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > In my humble opinion, implicitly stated, could be interpreted as an edict of
> > superiority? How so, as sarcasm?
>
> > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Tinker tinker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > A comment.
> > > "something so bad about adding the IMHO"
>
> > > I do put forth my opinion when I speak, unless I am quoting someone's
> > > opinion verbatim. Even then my interpretation and idea attached to the 
> > > other
> > > opinion is my opinion.
> > > Especially, on a forum such as this where the poster's name is prominently
> > > displayed with their opinion, the IMHO could be interpreted as an edict of
> > > ones opinion being superior.
>
> > > peace & Love
>
> > > ------------------------------
> > > Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:12:11 -0400
> > > Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: I am right and you are wrong
> > > From: [email protected]
> > > To: [email protected]
>
> > > First, fantastic post, which did well to question the nature of argument.
>
> > > Second, dialectic pursuits often do challenge us to a. assume a position 
> > > of
> > > correctness, and b. challenge an opposing position vigorously. Often, 
> > > those
> > > minute details you mentioned are exactly why an opposing position is
> > > incorrect. It truly can make all the difference in the world.
>
> > > Third, arrogance has no place in dialectics. One will always be
> > > unequivocally wrong at some point, for which I reserve my favorite phrase,
> > > Damitol. :) I like to think that the Minds Eye has less of the problems 
> > > you
> > > mention than various other forums.
>
> > > Fourth, is there really something so bad about adding the IMHO on to 
> > > posts?
> > > I throw those out there frequently. I often like to have the disclaimer on
> > > positional statements which I know are not as fully formed and supported 
> > > as
> > > my more axiomatic positions.
>
> > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:03 PM, BB47 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >   You know what I noticed about  people?  We all think we are
> > > “right.”  Every damn one of us.   Lucky for you , the statements I
> > > just made  are partially wrong,  so don’t take all this too seriously,
> > > but I am going to say it all anyway, and I am going to present
> > > everything I say  in a tone that sounds like I believe I am  right and
> > > that I know what I am talking about.  (Why do I do that?)  Why  do you
> > > do that?
>
> > >  Anyway, everywhere on the planet people are behaving this way, from
> > > the smartest to the dumbest.  I would say 90% of all people who post
> > > on an Internet forum claim they are absolutely correct about what they
> > > are telling you.  One hundred percent of them are wrong about one
> > > thing or another, and so is my ridiculous estimate of 90%.  (Don’t try
> > > and look it up, it will be wrong or distorted too)  The smartest ,
> > > most well informed people are wrong  more than they might imagine, as
> > > they would find out if they had access all of the bonafide correct
> > > information in the world right in front of them, which of course is
> > > impossible, because it doesn’t exist.  At least not in absolute form.
> > > But this neither occurs to them nor is any cause for pause.  They
> > > speak to others about their information and facts  as if  they are
> > > true.
>
> > >    The 10% remaining believe they are idiots, so they don’t say too
> > > much.  Now when the smartest people are wrong about something  the
> > > idiots believe it, and now they are wrong too.  And worse,  they are
> > > emboldened.  They now think they have some correct information to
> > > spread around.  It is a vicious circle.
>
> > >   Is it any wonder why people can’t get along?   The human race is a
> > > disaster.  Thank god I am wrong about that.  Oh sure, there are people
> > > who are actually “right” on the surface of it, but the more you dig,
> > > the wronger they get.  Just like the word “wronger”  (it is a very
> > > shallow dig with me, there is a plus side to all this)
>
> > >     Let’s say a person reads a book by an expert.  They now feel that
> > > they too are an expert, but they didn’t really absorb the entire
> > > book.  They think they did, but they didn’t.   If they were that smart
> > > or that informed they would have written the book instead of reading
> > > it.  You know that thing about telling ten people a story?  Well now
> > > this “book report”  will be passed down to the next person,  slightly
> > > or massively distorted,  and anybody who didn’t read it for
> > > themselves?   Well they might buy into the wrong interpretation.,
> > > carry around those wrong facts,  telling people that it is true,
> > > things that the expert didn’t even get right!
>
> > >    Even that original “expert” will be discredited by the next
> > > expert, who will shred that book, tear it apart, and claim to be right
> > > about it.  Now, the smart person poster who read the first book?  And
> > > told you how wrong  you were because of the book he read?  Well he too
> > > has dropped that first book as “rubbish” now in favor of the new
> > > author, who gets some things wrong as well. But does he apologize?
> > > Hell no,  people like that never apologize. They are never wrong about
> > > anything.
>
> > >  And why is it that people , when they are right, have to be such
> > > jerks about it?  Too many people do that.  “not only are you wrong,
> > > but here is a searing insult to go with it to really make it
> > > sting”   (Why in the hell do I do that?)   Why do you?  The smartest
> > > people can be the meanest.  And what does that say about their
> > > character?  Do the well informed get to get away with it?  Is
> > > knowledge more valued  than character around here? Not in my book,
> > > maybe in yours.   Oh, there are the people with actual wisdom, that
> > > don’t do these nasty things, but  there are so few of those.  They
> > > just say wise things,  because they think they are right too, some of
> > > which is wrong.  Just a smaller percentage is all.    The world is a
> > > very complex place and it might not be possible to be totally correct
> > > and be a human being..
>
> > >  So what do we do? Well I am going to set a new standard, I am going
> > > to be wrong all the time. Just to try it out and set an example.  Like
> > > right there, see how easy that was?  There is only one thing  wrong
> > > with “wrong.”  (which I feel is an improvement) but naturally  none of
> > > this is  correct.   You could tear it apart, like a dog with a paper
> > > towel roll, but then you would be proving my point by setting examples
> > > of how right you need to be before everyone’s eyes!     Go ahead, make
> > > my day.
>
> > >   There are so many smug, arrogant people in the world!  It is simply
> > > astounding. Just listen to us!  Can’t you hear it? They all think they
> > > are right, or have the golden truth,  the mystical knowledge, and the
> > > pure wisdom to offer us;  the less fortunate.  Not only that, but we
> > > often have it beaten into us by a know-it-all with a meat cleaver.
> > >    Well, they are all wrong about something.  But the most dangerous
> > > thing is that the smarter you think you are, the less you are likely
> > > to admit being wrong. Look around, make a count. I rest my case.  But
> > > nobody likes being wrong.  It is the single most powerful driving
> > > force of all human beings if I am not mistaken, which of course  I
> > > am.   Why do we read?  To become more righteous of course!  We want to
> > > be smart.  So we can tell other people about stuff and correct them
> > > when they are wrong!  Show them how smart we are!  What other possible
> > > reason is there?  (there are several….and I am wrong about that point
> > > in many other ways too, but that does not stop me, nor you from this
> > > drive to get smarter and “informed” so you can tell more people they
> > > are wrong)
>
> > >  Only the idiots admit being wrong.  And only because they are
> > > quickly pounded into submission by the  more informed,  with a snooty
> > > tone that only the smug can deliver, but the idiots can’t wait until
> > > they have something that they are right about so they can pound that
> > > nail in the head of somebody beneath them.  Look at most any post in
> > > any forum and tell me what you see.   I see somebody who thinks they
> > > are right, and the other is wrong.  It is virtually every single
> > > post.  (there I go again!)  Well that obviously can’t be true, because
> > > most of the posts oppose each other!  And even if they are not saying
> > > they are right, they are offering their opinions  of which  they are
> > > “selling” as right.  Like I do.  What pompous, arrogant, smug  jerks
> > > we all are. Each and every one of us.   Especially me,  for writing a
> > > post like this.  This is one hard to top, but keep reading, it gets
> > > even better.
>
> > >   If people were really honest, they would turn their heads from
> > > their  computer screens right now and puke their guts out in self
> > > disgust in light of this horrible  realization.  But of course none of
> > > you will.  Which proves my point with such indisputable precision that
> > > it can’t be wrong, even though it clearly  is.  The intellectuals have
> > > already stopped reading this post or discarded everything said in it
> > > as being drivel,  and are composing their wicked reply as you read,
> > > further proving my point. You know what would be ironic?  If a so
> > > often wrong person
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to