This probably has a simple answer, but what if somebody wants
something because they know it is perceived as bad?

On Aug 24, 7:23 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 24 Aug, 11:22, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Ahhhh well I guess then that cultural morality, and the question of
> > history and whether or not it is ethical to invade another land in
> > order to bring about the type of change ones own culture says is GOOD
> > is not as intersting as music.  Well honestly yes I can see why. ;¬)
>
> This brings up an old question: Is it that one desires something
> because one perceives it as good or does one perceive something as
> good because one desires it?  Most people would instinctively state
> the former...proving the latter.  ;-)
>
>
>
> > On 21 Aug, 14:50, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > On 21 Aug, 13:55, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > The idea that humility is the basis of grace is, I think, wonderful.
> > > > I have personally known several public officials who have taken a
> > > > great deal of flack and criticism over the years, yet know them to be
> > > > humble, loving people with empathy for others central to their
> > > > actions.  I wonder at the nature of our need for criticism, perhaps it
> > > > is driven, as you suggest, from occult low self esteem.  Roger Ebert,
> > > > the movie critic, is one I have watched over the years and enjoyed
> > > > even though he can be caustic and bend toward the popular at times.
> > > > Because of a recent bout with throat cancer, he continues his work as
> > > > a writer with a wonderful blog.  He posted recently that very few
> > > > people under 50 read the movie reviews and it is becoming a dying
> > > > trade.  It got me to thinking who wonderful life might be without
> > > > critics - which of course, does not include integrated discernment and
> > > > positive feedback.  That everybody wins spirit can be hard to find.
>
> > >   It's hard to find because it's not imbued into us as children.  If
> > > we taught that we are all in this together and were shown through
> > > example how we all can benefit, it would be a lot easier to find.
> > > Rather, we're taught how to compete and beat each other; so we grow up
> > > and fight and kill one another.  Garbage in, garbage out.  If we are
> > > to make that next evolutionary leap, we need to understand some home
> > > truths, but those truths upset the paradigm of fat and happy cats and
> > > those cats were taught to perceive others as competitors rather than
> > > brethren.
>
> > > > On Aug 21, 7:41 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > On 21 Aug, 12:05, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On the way to work this moring I was pondering over a thing with the
> > > > > > intent of bringing it up here.  Then of course I got into work and
> > > > > > promptly forgot all about it.
>
> > > > > > However when Pat said this:
>
> > > > > > 'The history of our world is littered with good 'bad examples', yet 
> > > > > > we
> > > > > > never see them as such and, so, are doomed to repeat them until we
> > > > > > sort out our perspectives.'
>
> > > > > > In the 'What is fair?' thread, it brought it all back to me, so 
> > > > > > first
> > > > > > off, cheers for that Pat.
>
> > > > >     No worries.  Synchronicity is a speciality of mine.  ;-)
>
> > > > > > Our history is rich with examples of one culture or one religoin
> > > > > > invadeing the terriotory of another country in order to bring their
> > > > > > own form of 'order' to that place.  Think British Empire, think
> > > > > > crusades, think Tibet.
>
> > > > > > So is this ethicaly sound, and is there then any differance between
> > > > > > these examples and our troops in Afganistan?
>
> > > > > The main difference is time.  The TRUTH is that we're all in this
> > > > > (world) together and it would behoove us (all!) if we 'grew up' and
> > > > > realised that.  Some people view their desires as more important than
> > > > > those of others.  So, rather than trying to seek out a way for all
> > > > > parties' desires to be striven for, those with a technological
> > > > > advantage, step on those without it and force their desires on the
> > > > > others without consideration (might makes right).  This is done by
> > > > > selfish/self-important, callous individuals who MAY also have a form
> > > > > of occult low self esteem veiled by an outward projection of arrogance
> > > > > (usually seen by others as false or baseless arrogance).  A good dose
> > > > > of empathy is the cure, but, unfortunately, it doesn't come in a
> > > > > tablet, capsule or injectible form.  Rather, it requires humility,
> > > > > which to the individual with an occult low self esteem, appears to be
> > > > > too big of a price to pay, as it requires themselves to humble
> > > > > themselves when they would rather be seen as 'on high'.  It was to
> > > > > this way of thinking that Jesus appealed to us by saying, "...those
> > > > > who would be last will be first and the first last".  Thus the true
> > > > > servant of God is a servant to all humanity, rather than attempting to
> > > > > be the Lord of all humanity.  It is for this reason that Islam
> > > > > endeavours to instruct its adherents to be 'slaves of Allah', i.e.,
> > > > > servants of God.  The term 'slave of Allah' is intended to be a great
> > > > > compliment, but many non-Muslims don't understand it and take offense
> > > > > at the term 'slave', not realising its intention as 'willing 
> > > > > servant'.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to