You are beautiful and i fully understand the logic such talent with words and expression. Allan
Oh yeah 4th time through still finding errors.. this is harder than writing it in the first place.... Allan On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Oh, so sorry, I did not mean to imply that people who enjoy beauty > pageants should feel as I do. I was just having fun with contestant > logic and rhetoric. (I feel so beautiful now.) > > On Aug 28, 2:23 pm, retiredjim34 <[email protected]> wrote: > > Molly - I'm sorry. I don't understand. Just why is it you don't watch > > beauty pageants? Actually I think they are sort of interesting. Jim > > > > On Aug 28, 11:08 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Which is why I don't watch beauty pageants because I should not watch > > > beauty pageants because if I was supposed to watch beauty pageants > > > then I would watch beauty pageants but I do not watch beauty pageants > > > which is why I would not watch beauty pageants. > > > > > Thanks, Jim. > > > > > On Aug 28, 10:45 am, retiredjim34 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Molly - Here's another view on living forever - I just came across > it. > > > > Jim > > > > ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, > > > > > > (On September 17, 1994, Alabama's Heather Whitestone was selected as > > > > Miss America 1995.) > > > > Question: If you could live forever, would you and why? > > > > Answer: "I would not live forever, because we should not live > forever, > > > > because if we were supposed to live forever, then we would live > > > > forever, but we cannot live forever, which is why I would not live > > > > forever," > > > > --Miss Alabama in the 1994 Miss USA contest. > > > > > > On Aug 10, 9:31 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > yes, and you have to wonder what it would do to our perspective of > > > > > past, present and future. We may end up like Billy Pilgrim in a > > > > > Vonnegut novel. > > > > > > > On Aug 10, 12:03 pm, retiredjim34 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Molly - very good - excellent point. I think it would be a > quantum > > > > > > leap from frantically trying to do everything, achieve whatever, > > > > > > before we died to focusing instead on the here and now. The > passage of > > > > > > time would loose much or all of its importance, I suspect. Thanks > for > > > > > > pointing this out. Jim > > > > > > > > On Aug 10, 8:41 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > A quantum leap into something better would in all probability > take > > > > > > > place if we ourselves were extending our lives ad infinitum by > a > > > > > > > change in viewpoint...a different perspective of time and space > and > > > > > > > life in general. Not sure that would come with aforeveryoung > > > > > > > pill... > > > > > > > > > On Aug 8, 4:35 pm, Alan Wostenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Good question, Jim. Endless life extension without aging? > > > > > > > > > > Assume the issues of bad social effects and distributive > justice > > > > > > > > raised in other responses were solved. Is endless > continuation of life > > > > > > > > even then appealing? > > > > > > > > > > What would be the purpose of, say, even 25% longer life? To > know more > > > > > > > > great grandchildren? To climb another corporate ladder? Gain > another > > > > > > > > PhD? > > > > > > > > > > It seems to me whatever temporal good one seeks, all such > goods are > > > > > > > > finite. Consequently, continuation of this life in a healthy > 30- > > > > > > > > something body is more of the same, and would eventually > become as > > > > > > > > boring as h-ll. Consider life beyond mere life extension: a > quantum > > > > > > > > leap to something better! > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 6, 1:01 pm, retiredjim34 <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Many of the recent threads - evolution, non-medical > healing, are we in > > > > > > > > > control, Feynman's mysteries, etc. - seem to dance around > on the > > > > > > > > > wavecrest of scientific discoveries. It strikes me that, > given the > > > > > > > > > major scientific advances in recent decades and the > increasing speed > > > > > > > > > of scientific progress, in the foreseeable future - 100 > years maybe - > > > > > > > > > humans may be able to elect tolivewithout aging. We might > well be > > > > > > > > > able to maintain our bodies at age 30 or 40 or whatever as > long as we > > > > > > > > > like. In other words, we might be able to choose > toliveforever. > > > > > > > > > If we accept that as a possibility, I wonder what sort > of > > > > > > > > > philosophical issues it raises. How might our view of life > and death > > > > > > > > > be changed, if at all? How would our economies adapt? Would > people > > > > > > > > > still marry for life? Would it change communities? Would > our > > > > > > > > > objectives - happy life, great wealth, friendships, > learning, travel > > > > > > > > > etc. - change, and if so how? And how would we settle such > issues? > > > > > > > > > Anyone care to pursue this thread? Jim- Hide quoted > text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > -- ( ) I_D Allan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
