Thanks for that, M. Love those little bits of unexpected beauty. On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Molly Brogan <[email protected]>wrote:
> > Byron > > SHE walks in beauty, like the night > Of cloudless climes and starry skies, > And all that's best of dark and bright > Meets in her aspect and her eyes; > Thus mellow'd to that tender light > Which Heaven to gaudy day denies. > > One shade the more, one ray the less, > Had half impair'd the nameless grace > Which waves in every raven tress > Or softly lightens o'er her face, > Where thoughts serenely sweet express > How pure, how dear their dwelling-place. > > And on that cheek and o'er that brow > So soft, so calm, yet eloquent, > The smiles that win, the tints that glow, > But tell of days in goodness spent,— > A mind at peace with all below, > A heart whose love is innocent. > > On Aug 29, 12:04 pm, retiredjim34 <[email protected]> wrote: > > Very nicely put. Is it original with you, or taken form some source? > > If from a source, I'd appreciate a cite for I'd like to read more from > > it. > > > > On Aug 29, 8:52 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > she walks in beauty like the night... > > > > > On Aug 29, 11:38 am, retiredjim34 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > What beauty contestants communicate to me is more non-verbal than > > > > verbal, I find. And some of them communicate quite well. > > > > > > On Aug 29, 5:51 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > And actually, since I think that self image has everything to do > with > > > > > health and beauty, the beauty contestant may just be on to > something > > > > > here...communication skills aside. > > > > > > > On Aug 29, 12:31 am, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > She must be very, very attractive. And that's all I've got to > say about > > > > > > that. > > > > > > > > dj > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:45 AM, retiredjim34 < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Molly - Here's another view on living forever - I just came > across it. > > > > > > > Jim > > > > > > > ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, > > > > > > > > > (On September 17, 1994, Alabama's Heather Whitestone was > selected as > > > > > > > Miss America 1995.) > > > > > > > Question: If you could live forever, would you and why? > > > > > > > Answer: "I would not live forever, because we should not live > forever, > > > > > > > because if we were supposed to live forever, then we would live > > > > > > > forever, but we cannot live forever, which is why I would not > live > > > > > > > forever," > > > > > > > --Miss Alabama in the 1994 Miss USA contest. > > > > > > > > > On Aug 10, 9:31 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > yes, and you have to wonder what it would do to our > perspective of > > > > > > > > past, present and future. We may end up like Billy Pilgrim > in a > > > > > > > > Vonnegut novel. > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 10, 12:03 pm, retiredjim34 <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Molly - very good - excellent point. I think it would be a > quantum > > > > > > > > > leap from frantically trying to do everything, achieve > whatever, > > > > > > > > > before we died to focusing instead on the here and now. The > passage of > > > > > > > > > time would loose much or all of its importance, I suspect. > Thanks for > > > > > > > > > pointing this out. Jim > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 10, 8:41 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > A quantum leap into something better would in all > probability take > > > > > > > > > > place if we ourselves were extending our lives ad > infinitum by a > > > > > > > > > > change in viewpoint...a different perspective of time and > space and > > > > > > > > > > life in general. Not sure that would come with > aforeveryoung > > > > > > > > > > pill... > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 8, 4:35 pm, Alan Wostenberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Good question, Jim. Endless life extension without > aging? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Assume the issues of bad social effects and > distributive justice > > > > > > > > > > > raised in other responses were solved. Is endless > continuation of > > > > > > > life > > > > > > > > > > > even then appealing? > > > > > > > > > > > > > What would be the purpose of, say, even 25% longer > life? To know > > > > > > > more > > > > > > > > > > > great grandchildren? To climb another corporate ladder? > Gain > > > > > > > another > > > > > > > > > > > PhD? > > > > > > > > > > > > > It seems to me whatever temporal good one seeks, all > such goods are > > > > > > > > > > > finite. Consequently, continuation of this life in a > healthy 30- > > > > > > > > > > > something body is more of the same, and would > eventually become as > > > > > > > > > > > boring as h-ll. Consider life beyond mere life > extension: a > > > > > > > quantum > > > > > > > > > > > leap to something better! > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 6, 1:01 pm, retiredjim34 <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Many of the recent threads - evolution, non-medical > healing, are > > > > > > > we in > > > > > > > > > > > > control, Feynman's mysteries, etc. - seem to dance > around on the > > > > > > > > > > > > wavecrest of scientific discoveries. It strikes me > that, given > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > major scientific advances in recent decades and the > increasing > > > > > > > speed > > > > > > > > > > > > of scientific progress, in the foreseeable future - > 100 years > > > > > > > maybe - > > > > > > > > > > > > humans may be able to elect tolivewithout aging. We > might well be > > > > > > > > > > > > able to maintain our bodies at age 30 or 40 or > whatever as long > > > > > > > as we > > > > > > > > > > > > like. In other words, we might be able to choose > toliveforever. > > > > > > > > > > > > If we accept that as a possibility, I wonder > what sort of > > > > > > > > > > > > philosophical issues it raises. How might our view of > life and > > > > > > > death > > > > > > > > > > > > be changed, if at all? How would our economies adapt? > Would > > > > > > > people > > > > > > > > > > > > still marry for life? Would it change communities? > Would our > > > > > > > > > > > > objectives - happy life, great wealth, friendships, > learning, > > > > > > > travel > > > > > > > > > > > > etc. - change, and if so how? And how would we settle > such > > > > > > > issues? > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone care to pursue this thread? Jim- Hide > quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
