Yesterday I said that that the right to be is the paramout right. This article is interesting in that it seeks to curtail such a right for this woman on the grounds of her low IQ.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/8222689.stm I think that perhaps she may not be fully aware of the conseqences of her decision, but does that mean that she should not be able to make it? How much can a duty of care, inpingh up the right to be, or do you think that such a right simply does not exist? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
