Ha, like Molly became Angie Merkel.

Lee, I won't bother you with German politics. If you remember "We've
got the power" by Snap you know more than you ever wanted to know
about this topic.

On 5 Sep., 05:28, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maggie didn't exactly fade away Don - she became Tony Blair (the drag
> version).
>
> On 5 Sep, 01:22, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I wonder how you Brits/Euros entertain yourselves now that you don't
> > have poor Maggie to kick around anymore.
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czVPqqWFVFM
>
> > dj
>
> > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:45 AM, frantheman<[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
>
> > > ... Tom Robinson, Joe Jackson, U2 ...
>
> > > what ... did you say *shudder* Maggie Thatcher? Ok, mate, case closed.

> > > You win.
>
> > > Francis
>
googlemail.com" <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >> Okay Madness I'll give you and perhaps The Cure, Depeche Mode too, but
> > >> I draw the line at Spandau!
>
> > >> I drawlking of shit, what about Flock of Seagullg of sh and the
> > >> Bunnymen, what about crazy laces, and clashing colours, big baggy
> > , and clrs, suit jackets with the sleeves rolled up*ugh*, backcombed
> > >> hair, lipstick and eye makeup on men, race riots, polltax and
> > >> *shudder* Maggie Thatcher.
>
> > >> There you see cae Thatced.
>
> > >> On 4 Sep, 16:23, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > Oh come on, lee, > wrote:
>pandau Ballet, The Cure, Depeche Mode ...
> > >> > As Frank'n'furter remarked .
> > >tte after seducing er remaut it
> > >> > wasn't aeducing her, "?"
>
> > >> > Francis
>
> > >> > On 4 Sep., 17:18, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> > >> > wrote:
>
> > >> > > Ohh shame on you sir!  I also was young in the 80's and yet I still
> > >> > > call it 's a decade that taste forgot'.
>
> > >> > > No no it was rather a crap decade.
>
> > >> > > On 4 Sep, 16:16, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > > > Hall & Oates? No, Chris, plea>> > > > HA good example of the worst 
> > >> > > > the
> > >> > > > 80s had to offer (and I normally like the 80s! - after all, I was
> > >> > > > young then :-) ) ...
>
> > >> > > > Francis
>
> > >> > > > On 4 Sep., 17:13, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > > > > Where is Hall during all this?
>
> > >> > > > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:12 AM, frantheman 
> > >> > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > >> > > > > > *** I think Oates has gone out for a p*** I thin*
>
> > >> > > > > > On 4 Sep., 16:53, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > I might have guessed Slip would be my Admundsen oe guesse
>
te:
>
> > >> > > > > > > > I am somewhat seriously concerned we don't really have the 
> > >> > > > > > > > ....@googls
> > >> > > > > > > > under general public scrutinwhat seraps we could write a 
> > >> > > > > > > > book Slip,
> > >> > > > > > > > with cryptic clues on the location of your Swiss Army 
> > >> > > > > > > > Knife and the
> > >> > > > > > > > temptation of a reward for the first of the horde that buy 
> > >> > > > > > > > the book at
> > >> > > > > > > > 10% of our net?  A world stupid enough not to understand 
> > >> > > > > > > > how serious
> > >> > > > > > > > the weather is must be stupid enough to buy into to the 
> > >> > > > > > > > book.  No
> > >> > > > > > > > doubt we should write the book during sipping sessions 
> > >> > > > > > > > round at Chris'
> > >> > > > > > > > place.
>
> > >> > > > > > > > On 3 Sep, 18:12, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > Actually Arch, I've already sun bathed at the North 
> > >> > > > > > > > > Pole, fact is I
> > >> > > > > > > > > really can't wait for the caps to melt down again 
> > >> > > > > > > > > completely because
> > >> > > > > > > > > it seems I left my Swiss Army knife and a good pari of 
> > >> > > > > > > > > sunglassed up
> > >> > > > > > > > > there.  I'm sure they'll be well preserved.
> > >> > > > > > > > > The signs of the melting polar caps tell a grim tale, 
> > >> > > > > > > > > for example
> > >> > > > > > look
> >  >> > > > > > > > > at this.........
> > >> > > > > >http://www.gemzies.com/img_photos/melting_polar_ice_caps_global_warmi...
> > >> > > > > > > > > Further studies and scientific indicators reveal a stark 
> > >> > > > > > > > > truth
> > >> > > > > > > > > regardless what global warming critics have to say. We 
> > >> > > > > > > > > might all be
> > >> > > > > > > > > living like this soon..........
> > >> > > > > >http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/03/flood.jpg
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > Whether I'll be around to retrieve my knife and glasses 
> > >> > > > > > > > > is another
> > >> > > > > > > > > issue altogether!
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > On Sep 3, 8:06 am, archytas <[email protected]> 
> > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > The Eocene ran from 56 million to 34 million years 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > ago, much longer
> > >> > > > > > > > > > than humans have existed unless science is just a 34 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > millisher
> > >> > > > > > > > > > memeory. Geological evidence from the early and middle 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > part of this
> > >> > > > > > > > > > period offers troubling news: the average temperature 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > in the
> > >> > > > > > tropics
> > >> > > > > > > > > > at this timetroublihave been as high as 40°C while the 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > poles were
> > >> > > > > > at
> > >> > > > > > > > > > temperatures of 15 or 20°C. None of our climate models 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > accounts for
> > >> > > > > > > > > > how this "Eocene hothouse" might have arisen (New 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Scientist, 21
> > >> > > > > > June
> > >> > > > > > > > > > 2008, p 34).  This is bad news for life on Earth. For 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > a start, any
> > >> > > > > > > > > > tweaks we make to our climate models to account for it 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > will produce
> > >> > > > > > > > > > scarier predictions of warming. Secondly, it suggests 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > that there is
> > >> > > > > > no
> > >> > > > > > > > > > feedback mechanism that will stabilise a warming world 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > against
> > >> > > > > > runaway
> > >> > > > > > > > > > climate change. And third, there is geological 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > evidence for plant
> > >> > > > > > > > > > extinctions in the Eocene.  If the modern Earth goes 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > the same way
> > >> > > > > > and
> > >> > > > > > > > > > plants in the tropics start dying, that will provide 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > yet another
> > >> > > > > > way
> > >> > > > > > > > > > for atmospheric carbon dioxide levels to rise faster. 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > The Eocene
> > >> > > > > > > > > > hothouse anomaly suggests that our worst-case scenario 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > is probably
> > >> > > > > > > > > > optimistic to say the least.  Human contributions have 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > been puny in
> > >> > > > > > > > > > comparison.  The only place safe to sun-bathe may well 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > be Santa's
> > >> > > > > > back
> > >> > > > > > > > > > garden and the elves have already staked out the sun 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > beds as surely
> > >> > > > > > as
> > >> > > > > > > > > > early-rising Germans in Majorca.  This makes me wonder 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > whether the
> > >> > > > > > > > > > secret primaries are politicians go through involve 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > such matters as
> > >> > > > > > > > > > pissing in the wind contests.
>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > I'm agnostic in the sense I can't disprove the 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > existence of some
> > >> > > > > > kind
> > >> > > > > > > > > > of god (to be honest I think 'something' we don't 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > construe well is
> > >> > > > > > > > > > likely and is likely to have nothing to do with our 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > fables around
> > >> > > > > > the
> > >> > > > > > > > > > world).  Information such as the above and a lot of 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > basic science
> > >> > > > > > we
> > >> > > > > > > > > > are all part of is at bottom what I believe in.  The 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > elves, of
> > >> > > > > > course,
> > >> > > > > > > > > > only appear when Chris and I share his magic brew 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > whilst teasing
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Flying Harringtons on the days we devote to world 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > domination in our
> > >> > > > > > > > > > off-shore bunker created by skimming Craig's massive 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > profits as
> > >> > > > > > owner
> > >> > > > > > > > > > of this group (some believe Craig is only a fictitious 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Patas
> > >> >
> > >> > > > > > have
 the above, there
> > >> > > > > > are
> > >> > > > > > > > > > real questions about Dawkins telling us god probably 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > doesn't exist
> > >> > > > > > and
> > >> > > > > > > > > > we should just get on with life.  What signs do we 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > show of a form
> > >> > > > > > of
> > >> > > > > > > > > > lie that takes the real information above seriously?- 
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Hide quoted text -
>
> > >> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted texorm
> >
>
> > >> > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to