Angie has clearly been made over Gabby. What a shame we can't take back video of her now back to the Stasi!
On 5 Sep, 22:13, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > I LOVED that song for working out to. Now I'll have to listen to it with a > whole different mindset... > > > > On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:42 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ha, like Molly became Angie Merkel. > > > Lee, I won't bother you with German politics. If you remember "We've > > got the power" by Snap you know more than you ever wanted to know > > about this topic. > > > On 5 Sep., 05:28, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Maggie didn't exactly fade away Don - she became Tony Blair (the drag > > > version). > > > > On 5 Sep, 01:22, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I wonder how you Brits/Euros entertain yourselves now that you don't > > > > have poor Maggie to kick around anymore. > > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czVPqqWFVFM > > > > > dj > > > > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:45 AM, frantheman< > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > ... Tom Robinson, Joe Jackson, U2 ... > > > > > > what ... did you say *shudder* Maggie Thatcher? Ok, mate, case > > closed. > > > > > > You win. > > > > > > Francis > > > googlemail.com" <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> Okay Madness I'll give you and perhaps The Cure, Depeche Mode too, > > but > > > > >> I draw the line at Spandau! > > > > > >> I drawlking of shit, what about Flock of Seagullg of sh and the > > > > >> Bunnymen, what about crazy laces, and clashing colours, big baggy > > > > , and clrs, suit jackets with the sleeves rolled up*ugh*, backcombed > > > > >> hair, lipstick and eye makeup on men, race riots, polltax and > > > > >> *shudder* Maggie Thatcher. > > > > > >> There you see cae Thatced. > > > > > >> On 4 Sep, 16:23, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> > Oh come on, lee, > wrote: > > >pandau Ballet, The Cure, Depeche Mode ... > > > > >> > As Frank'n'furter remarked . > > > > >tte after seducing er remaut it > > > > >> > wasn't aeducing her, "?" > > > > > >> > Francis > > > > > >> > On 4 Sep., 17:18, "[email protected]" < > > [email protected]> > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > > >> > > Ohh shame on you sir! I also was young in the 80's and yet I > > still > > > > >> > > call it 's a decade that taste forgot'. > > > > > >> > > No no it was rather a crap decade. > > > > > >> > > On 4 Sep, 16:16, frantheman <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > Hall & Oates? No, Chris, plea>> > > > HA good example of the > > worst the > > > > >> > > > 80s had to offer (and I normally like the 80s! - after all, I > > was > > > > >> > > > young then :-) ) ... > > > > > >> > > > Francis > > > > > >> > > > On 4 Sep., 17:13, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > Where is Hall during all this? > > > > > >> > > > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:12 AM, frantheman < > > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > *** I think Oates has gone out for a p*** I thin* > > > > > >> > > > > > On 4 Sep., 16:53, archytas <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > I might have guessed Slip would be my Admundsen oe > > guesse > > > te: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I am somewhat seriously concerned we don't really have > > the ....@googls > > > > >> > > > > > > > under general public scrutinwhat seraps we could write > > a book Slip, > > > > >> > > > > > > > with cryptic clues on the location of your Swiss Army > > Knife and the > > > > >> > > > > > > > temptation of a reward for the first of the horde that > > buy the book at > > > > >> > > > > > > > 10% of our net? A world stupid enough not to > > understand how serious > > > > >> > > > > > > > the weather is must be stupid enough to buy into to > > the book. No > > > > >> > > > > > > > doubt we should write the book during sipping sessions > > round at Chris' > > > > >> > > > > > > > place. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On 3 Sep, 18:12, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Actually Arch, I've already sun bathed at the North > > Pole, fact is I > > > > >> > > > > > > > > really can't wait for the caps to melt down again > > completely because > > > > >> > > > > > > > > it seems I left my Swiss Army knife and a good pari > > of sunglassed up > > > > >> > > > > > > > > there. I'm sure they'll be well preserved. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > The signs of the melting polar caps tell a grim > > tale, for example > > > > >> > > > > > look > > > > >> > > > > > > > > at this......... > > >http://www.gemzies.com/img_photos/melting_polar_ice_caps_global_warmi... > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Further studies and scientific indicators reveal a > > stark truth > > > > >> > > > > > > > > regardless what global warming critics have to say. > > We might all be > > > > >> > > > > > > > > living like this soon.......... > > >http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/03/flood.jpg > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Whether I'll be around to retrieve my knife and > > glasses is another > > > > >> > > > > > > > > issue altogether! > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Sep 3, 8:06 am, archytas <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > The Eocene ran from 56 million to 34 million years > > ago, much longer > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > than humans have existed unless science is just a > > 34 millisher > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > memeory. Geological evidence from the early and > > middle part of this > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > period offers troubling news: the average > > temperature in the > > > > >> > > > > > tropics > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > at this timetroublihave been as high as 40°C while > > the poles were > > > > >> > > > > > at > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > temperatures of 15 or 20°C. None of our climate > > models accounts for > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > how this "Eocene hothouse" might have arisen (New > > Scientist, 21 > > > > >> > > > > > June > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 2008, p 34). This is bad news for life on Earth. > > For a start, any > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > tweaks we make to our climate models to account > > for it will produce > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > scarier predictions of warming. Secondly, it > > suggests that there is > > > > >> > > > > > no > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > feedback mechanism that will stabilise a warming > > world against > > > > >> > > > > > runaway > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > climate change. And third, there is geological > > evidence for plant > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > extinctions in the Eocene. If the modern Earth > > goes the same way > > > > >> > > > > > and > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > plants in the tropics start dying, that will > > provide yet another > > > > >> > > > > > way > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > for atmospheric carbon dioxide levels to rise > > faster. The Eocene > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > hothouse anomaly suggests that our worst-case > > scenario is probably > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > optimistic to say the least. Human contributions > > have been puny in > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > comparison. The only place safe to sun-bathe may > > well be Santa's > > > > >> > > > > > back > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > garden and the elves have already staked out the > > sun beds as surely > > > > >> > > > > > as > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > early-rising Germans in Majorca. This makes me > > wonder whether the > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > secret primaries are politicians go through > > involve such matters as > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > pissing in the wind contests. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I'm agnostic in the sense I can't disprove the > > existence of some > > > > >> > > > > > kind > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > of god (to be honest I think 'something' we don't > > construe well is > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > likely and is likely to have nothing to do with > > our fables around > > > > >> > > > > > the > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > world). Information such as the above and a lot > > of basic science > > > > >> > > > > > we > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > are all part of is at bottom what I believe in. > > The elves, of > > > > >> > > > > > course, > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > only appear when Chris and I share his magic brew > > whilst teasing > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Flying Harringtons on the days we devote to world > > domination in our > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > off-shore bunker created by skimming Craig's > > massive profits as > > > > >> > > > > > owner > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > of this group (some believe Craig is only a > > fictitious Patas > > > > > >> > > > > > have > > the above, there > > > > >> > > > > > are > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > real questions about Dawkins telling us god > > probably doesn't exist > > > > >> > > > > > and > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > we should just get on with life. What signs do we > > show of a form > > > > >> > > > > > of > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > lie that takes the real information above > > seriously?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > >> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted texorm > > > > > >> > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
