Honor killings protect the image of a family when it feels it has been
debased or insulted. To dilute the process further, it can take the
form of shunning or culling social or business ties- a metaphorical
"death".

On Sep 25, 10:27 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 25 Sep, 13:55, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Umm 'doing the right thing' and 'more to do with ethics than morals'
> > would suggest that Honour is bound up in ethics.  Just an aside then
> > if ethics is concerend with doing what is right, and morals are
> > concerned with questions of what is right or wrong, then can it be
> > true that ethics are as subjective as morality?
>
>      As I've said before, ethics is a societal thing and morals are
> personal.  Ethics are subjective to a society and morals are
> subjective to an individual.  Right and wrong, whether perceived by a
> society or an individual are still just perceptions based on a
> profound lack of information (in that every act we perform has
> reactions that carry on from that point forward and, as we have no
> access to the future, we should endeavour to ensure that our actions
> should lead to predominately positive results.).  And, it might seem
> contradictory in light of our free will conversations, but, I think
> that, if the person about to commit an honour killing has the
> opportunity to speculate that they don't HAVE to kill, then they
> should feel obliged NOT to, if for no other reason than that they may
> not know the full circumstances regarding the original killing (which
> MAY have been in self-defense) and are, by taking up their 'right',
> may, actually, be giving the other family the true 'right' to return
> like for like.  And the cycle continues.  It's for reasons like THIS
> that I feel the ability (and opportunity) to speculate about an
> unknown future is just as important (and still makes us liable) as
> having free will in its usual sense.
>
> > Aside over.
>
> > More I need more people, I'm trying to understand this concept of
> > honour.  Honour killings for example strike me as well not really
> > honourable at all, the honour of the family, what does that actualy
> > mean?
>
>      Honour killings were based on the old 'Eye for an Eye' rule,
> which, of course, meant not more than an eye for an eye...  So, if
> someone killed a member of your family, the code allowed the injured
> family to kill a member of the originally offending family to offset
> their murder.  However, to those that abide by that code, I would
> remind them that "'Vengeance is mine', saith the Lord" and let God
> deal with it, as only He has access to ALL the information regarding
> it.  So, whilst the law (or code) may permit the retaliation, it would
> be more 'Godlike' if the offended family acted more godly and
> exercised their mercy and let God dole out the judgements, rather than
> assume that their retaliation IS God's judgement.
>
>
>
> > On 25 Sep, 13:32, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Well, an individual must abide by the code of his/her culture although
> > > one can walk away from dishonour and generally pay a steep price for
> > > it. I think it means doing the right thing despite the cost.
>
> > > On Sep 25, 6:48 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > On 25 Sep, 12:13, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > It seems an easy enough question.  What is it, what does it mean to
> > > > > have it, what acts are honourable and what not?
>
> > > > It mostly depends on culture.  It was honourable to the Aztecs to be
> > > > sacrificed to Quetzalcoatl, I doubt many today would feel the same.
> > > > Thieves, at one time, had a code of conduct, making some theiving
> > > > honourable and other thieving not honourable.  Seppuku (harakiri) is
> > > > considered honourable in Japanese culture, but viewed as simple
> > > > suicide and damnable by the West.  Roughly, honour (like good and
> > > > evil) is, like its opposite, shame, an opinion/perception and is
> > > > relative.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to