I chose this one: http://www.philosophynow.org/issue47/47midgley.htm , and wondered if the concept of epigenetics would have been installed in the second part of her article.
On 30 Sep., 02:26, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > http://www.philosophynow.org/selection > Philosophy Now isn't bad for anyone who flirts with philosophy as I > do. The above link takes you to some free articles. OK if you are in > a certain kind of mood. > > I was struck by someone footling about with post-postmodernism. > Postmodernism was an unworthy genre that insisted we teach our > students about the massive potentials of diversity and an insurrection > of local knowledges whilst acting as the administrators of a bums- > through-seats sausage factory academy in which higher education had > become just another big business. We lied about caring as easily as a > cosmetic advert and let standards drop so far a current degree is > worth a lot less than a couple of A levels 30 years ago and we are > churning out graduates who know less than the technicians running our > labs. The guy seems to have caught up with this in 2006 and named it > pseudo-modernism. Better late-than-neverism maybe? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
