I don't think I'll be uploading any viddies unless someone donates some reasonable recording equipment...but I promise you, you won't be reaching for the x. :^D
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Just one more good theory blown to kingdom come. I haven't heard you > sing, Chris, but know you can upload to utube and would be quick to > view the link! Can't promise I won't be frantically looking for that > big red X, though. Your writing skills are top notch, I will say > that. > > On Oct 7, 10:18 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've been known to light a pelen tan from time to time, Neil. As for > Fran's > > theory, I'm a far better singer than player, although I suppose I'd be a > > fair bard if someone else was working the lute. All respect to Joyce, I > > think I'm a fair writer as well. > > > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:23 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Your theory may work for you and I Francis, but it's Jenkins who > > > claims the Welsh ancestry in here - perhaps the Druid 'roots' show in > > > him? > > > > > On 7 Oct, 20:16, Doris Ragland <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Good > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Matthijs <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > If we boltly go were no man has gone before I'd be sure to hand it > > > > > over to you! > > > > > > > On 7 okt, 14:46, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Scotty was suspiciously Irish Francis; one would have thought > he's > > > > > > have come up with heretic's ruse. I've just been skimming > another > > > > > > Irishman - JD Bernal - volume 3 of 6 on the history of science > > > > > > published in 1954 and still rather ahead of us. On computing he > > > ruses > > > > > > that maybe we are moving away from individual greed towards an > > > > > > electronic connected life beyond pathetic human foibles, making > my > > > > > > thoughts very dated altogether! Be careful with that emergency > flare > > > > > > Matt - I've seen your 'form'! > > > > > > > > On 6 Oct, 18:34, Doris Ragland <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Was good. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Matthijs < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Agreed, 2 to beam up scotty. > > > > > > > > > > On 6 okt, 13:01, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Probably a mad Scotsman and a mad Dutchman working out they > > > have > > > > > been > > > > > > > > > marooned Doris. > > > > > > > > > > > On 6 Oct, 03:12, Doris Ragland <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > what what is all this?????????? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 3:36 am, Matthijs <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wonderful, that story came right from the soul! But you > > > seem > > > > > somewhat > > > > > > > > > > > focussed on the sexual aspects of future creations, > > > whatever is > > > > > in > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > future can impossible be much worse than a hooker in a > > > cheap > > > > > motel, > > > > > > > > > > > keep that in mind. And do not forget that S. Hawking > > > gambled > > > > > about > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > existence and creation of our universe, for a > subscription > > > on > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > private eye and the playmate (important to notice: he > won). > > > So > > > > > > > > science > > > > > > > > > > > is showing some good developments, in our benefits. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthijs > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthijs > > > > > > > > > > > On 1 okt, 15:39, archytas <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been something of an addict over the years too > > > Matt. > > > > > I am > > > > > > > > > > > > highly critical of the science and the soap opera > > > morality > > > > > and wish > > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > > > > could try something less obviously edifying and > > > 'American'. > > > > > 'We > > > > > > > > like > > > > > > > > > > > > Star Trek, but why are there no Arabs in it?' asks > the > > > Saudi. > > > > > > > > > > > > 'Because it's set in the future', replies President > Bush > > > > > (pick from > > > > > > > > > > > > two equally evil). Janeway has a few genocides to > > > account > > > > > for. > > > > > > > > Warp > > > > > > > > > > > > travel is essentially flawed - the Hawking radiation > > > would > > > > > get us. > > > > > > > > > > > > Still, it whiles away the hours! Q could be George W > > > playing > > > > > with > > > > > > > > his > > > > > > > > > > > > military toys and foreign policy! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My own story concerns the birth of relativity-travel > (we > > > age > > > > > only > > > > > > > > 30 > > > > > > > > > > > > years in travelling to the 'edge of the universe', > but it > > > > > ages 15 > > > > > > > > > > > > billion years as we 'get there'), new genetic form > > > including > > > > > GROCS > > > > > > > > > > > > that render lying a poor strategy and give pleasure > and > > > > > learning > > > > > > > > > > > > beyond current imagination and a Cathar sect > determined > > > to > > > > > stop > > > > > > > > > > > > relativity-travel in order to prevent any human > future so > > > > > that > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > > > can be a general return to the preferable > nothingness. > > > Here > > > > > lies > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > opportunity for fresh ethical debates - what would > the > > > love > > > > > between > > > > > > > > > > > > man and woman be when procreation was robotised, > sexual > > > > > pleasure as > > > > > > > > > > > > nothing compared with GROCS-based intensity, > > > Machiavellian > > > > > plotting > > > > > > > > > > > > doomed to pathetic failure (it is now isn't it?) > because > > > > > learning > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > so easily shared, dishonesty so difficult to maintain > and > > > > > over- > > > > > > > > > > > > population 'cured' by two world wars and humanity > (such > > > as it > > > > > might > > > > > > > > > > > > become with genetic control) not confined to a time > > > relative > > > > > only > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > the heat death of the sun and our own destruction of > the > > > > > planet? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > GROCS is a genetic-relational open communication > system > > > (my > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > Orn for introduction to grok). I will never finish > the > > > > > writing if > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > > attempt to explain all. Chris and I are returning to > > > > > Moonbase > > > > > > > > Three > > > > > > > > > > > > after a year mining new life from a Jupiter moon - a > > > somewhat > > > > > > > > mushroom- > > > > > > > > > > > > enlivened period as we had to work GROCS-free though > > > strange > > > > > > > > gravity > > > > > > > > > > > > and zero gravity, playing adolescent games with early > > > 21st > > > > > century > > > > > > > > > > > > porn and women-fancying (to better understand the > > > mentality > > > > > that > > > > > > > > had > > > > > > > > > > > > led to WW3 and 4), though we already live lives > without > > > this > > > > > on > > > > > > > > what > > > > > > > > > > > > is left of Earth. Harem dreams are as nothing once > one > > > can > > > > > GROCS, > > > > > > > > > > > > reproductive fetish (what woman in this new world > would > > > want > > > > > the > > > > > > > > pain > > > > > > > > > > > > and time-consumption of pregnancy) as nothing when > one > > > can > > > > > build > > > > > > > > new > > > > > > > > > > > > life that can travel the universe, pleasure so > intense > > > and > > > > > varied > > > > > > > > one > > > > > > > > > > > > can listen to Beethoven's 9th as a connoisseur might, > > > learn > > > > > as the > > > > > > > > > > > > best can ... one might boldly go beyond the > replacement > > > of > > > > > the > > > > > > > > horse > > > > > > > > > > > > by Enterprise or Voyager. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 30 Sep, 12:34, Matthijs < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I love the series, it gives me fresh ideas. And has > > > good > > > > > moral > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > ethic debates. I like the Q episodes. > > > > > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pZSw7ojvw8&feature=related-Hidequoted. > > > .. > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
