very funny Scotty, now beam down my clothes Allan
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Matthijs <[email protected]> wrote: > > Agreed, 2 to beam up scotty. > > On 6 okt, 13:01, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > Probably a mad Scotsman and a mad Dutchman working out they have been > > marooned Doris. > > > > On 6 Oct, 03:12, Doris Ragland <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > what what is all this?????????? > > > > > On Oct 2, 3:36 am, Matthijs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Wonderful, that story came right from the soul! But you seem somewhat > > > > focussed on the sexual aspects of future creations, whatever is in > the > > > > future can impossible be much worse than a hooker in a cheap motel, > > > > keep that in mind. And do not forget that S. Hawking gambled about > the > > > > existence and creation of our universe, for a subscription on the > > > > private eye and the playmate (important to notice: he won). So > science > > > > is showing some good developments, in our benefits. > > > > > > Matthijs > > > > > > Matthijs > > > > On 1 okt, 15:39, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I have been something of an addict over the years too Matt. I am > > > > > highly critical of the science and the soap opera morality and wish > we > > > > > could try something less obviously edifying and 'American'. 'We > like > > > > > Star Trek, but why are there no Arabs in it?' asks the Saudi. > > > > > 'Because it's set in the future', replies President Bush (pick from > > > > > two equally evil). Janeway has a few genocides to account for. > Warp > > > > > travel is essentially flawed - the Hawking radiation would get us. > > > > > Still, it whiles away the hours! Q could be George W playing with > his > > > > > military toys and foreign policy! > > > > > > > My own story concerns the birth of relativity-travel (we age only > 30 > > > > > years in travelling to the 'edge of the universe', but it ages 15 > > > > > billion years as we 'get there'), new genetic form including GROCS > > > > > that render lying a poor strategy and give pleasure and learning > > > > > beyond current imagination and a Cathar sect determined to stop > > > > > relativity-travel in order to prevent any human future so that > there > > > > > can be a general return to the preferable nothingness. Here lies > the > > > > > opportunity for fresh ethical debates - what would the love between > > > > > man and woman be when procreation was robotised, sexual pleasure as > > > > > nothing compared with GROCS-based intensity, Machiavellian plotting > > > > > doomed to pathetic failure (it is now isn't it?) because learning > is > > > > > so easily shared, dishonesty so difficult to maintain and over- > > > > > population 'cured' by two world wars and humanity (such as it might > > > > > become with genetic control) not confined to a time relative only > to > > > > > the heat death of the sun and our own destruction of the planet? > > > > > > > GROCS is a genetic-relational open communication system (my thanks > to > > > > > Orn for introduction to grok). I will never finish the writing if > I > > > > > attempt to explain all. Chris and I are returning to Moonbase > Three > > > > > after a year mining new life from a Jupiter moon - a somewhat > mushroom- > > > > > enlivened period as we had to work GROCS-free though strange > gravity > > > > > and zero gravity, playing adolescent games with early 21st century > > > > > porn and women-fancying (to better understand the mentality that > had > > > > > led to WW3 and 4), though we already live lives without this on > what > > > > > is left of Earth. Harem dreams are as nothing once one can GROCS, > > > > > reproductive fetish (what woman in this new world would want the > pain > > > > > and time-consumption of pregnancy) as nothing when one can build > new > > > > > life that can travel the universe, pleasure so intense and varied > one > > > > > can listen to Beethoven's 9th as a connoisseur might, learn as the > > > > > best can ... one might boldly go beyond the replacement of the > horse > > > > > by Enterprise or Voyager. > > > > > > > On 30 Sep, 12:34, Matthijs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I love the series, it gives me fresh ideas. And has good moral > and > > > > > > ethic debates. I like the Q episodes. > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pZSw7ojvw8&feature=related-Hidequoted text > - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > -- ( ) I_D Allan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
