But then, how evil is he?

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 7:59 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> We offset a bit of despair Chris.  I sense a new play based on an evil
> sheep that slips some weed into Wallace and Grommit's Wensleydale.
>
> On 23 Oct, 00:45, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> > ...and Nietzsche died broken and alone. The difference between hope and
> no
> > hope is in action taken to offset the despair, whether literal action, or
> > literary.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, archytas <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Striving after the truth has often been held to be depressive.  David
> > > Hume broke his health in a 5 year period of focusing on 'a new medium
> > > of truth'. He felt, alone in his study, shut in, antisocial and a
> > > little silly - 'abandoned and disconsolate'.  It is not unusual, in
> > > philosophy, to feel an utter meaninglessness in life.  It can be a way
> > > of collecting 'brown stamps' and these need unloading.
> > > I've just watched BBC Question Time with Nick Griffin on it.  He's a
> > > very confused man, steeped in uncomfortable traditions of fascism,
> > > though strangely articulating what many of us feel about our dismal
> > > politics (mostly of an elite) and changes that immigration is partly
> > > responsible for.  He talks of a weird notion of a 'British Aboriginal'
> > > having all kinds of problems dumped in its culture, discriminated
> > > against as surely as any 'Red Indian' or similar group.  He is a wacho
> > > and it is interesting to see him in action - the point being that we
> > > somehow will not face the real issues directly or allow their direct
> > > expression and somehow end up with this strawman.  He can only exist
> > > because our establishment is in denial and cannot bear to admit its
> > > mistakes.  We allow no time to get to the real issues, which should be
> > > about creating a fair society that would not need such dark
> > > expression.
> >
> > > On 22 Oct, 21:58, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > I think you hit the button Jim.  I have seen academe die in the do do
> > > > - become Slip's Dodo.  Argument is often just a performance -
> > > > decisions made not in the dialogue but later in the closed-rooms of
> > > > power.
> >
> > > > On 22 Oct, 20:44, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > I know just what you mean,, ideas have to have time to develop,
>  and
> > > even
> > > > > then so many ideas are beyond me. I am grateful people allow me to
> be
> > > part
> > > > > of the group. It is so important to be able to think,, if I can not
> > > think it
> > > > > is then I begin to die.
> > > > > Allan
> >
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > I think Jim that no matter what the end result of any threads
> here it
> > > > > > is all helpful.
> >
> > > > > > Even when we can't agree, even when we drift in and aout of
> topic, it
> > > > > > all helps to focus the mind, to get the brain ticking over.  I
> know
> > > > > > for certian that every thread I perticipate in, it causes me to
> think
> > > > > > deeply perhaps for weeks perhaps for months.  Yes it is well
> worth my
> > > > > > coming here, not matter how much do do I have to wade through.
> >
> > > > > > On 22 Oct, 05:33, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SojAZ0X1e0
> >
> > > > > > > Before Francis beats me to it.
> >
> > > > > > > When I do it it's 'cause of my wandering attention span.  Makes
> my
> > > > > > > link all the more relevant.
> >
> > > > > > > dj
> >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Slip Disc <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > do do is a bird my friend!
> >
> > > > > > > > Could you give us an example thread that has drifted off into
> > > doo-doo?
> >
> > > > > > > > Doo, doo, doo, lookin out my back door.
> >
> > > > > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNczeP33Yk0
> >
> > > > > > > > On Oct 21, 6:19 pm, retiredjim34 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>     Has anyone else noticed that threads here often seem to
> > > drift off
> > > > > > > >> into deeper and deeper do-do? Given the focus of this group,
> we
> > > might
> > > > > > > >> all hope for increasing clarity and profundity as a thread
> > > develops.
> > > > > > > >> But do-do seems to be an irresistible magnet. Yet we plod
> on,
> > > getting
> > > > > > > >> in deeper and deeper instead of wiser and wiser.
> > > > > > > >>     Is ever deeper do-do just a tendency of human discourse?
> Or
> > > might
> > > > > > > >> it be something that is inherent in philosophical
> discussions?
> > > Any
> > > > > > > >> thoughts, Archy or Molly?- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > > > --
> > > > > (
> > > > >  )
> > > > > I_D Allan
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to