Here is a second draft, which is little changed, except for a
reordering, merging, and splitting of paragraphs, and the omission of
the statement about being "depressed" (because an extreme state of
mind outside "normal" coping mechanisms does not imply either
irrationality or a physical malfunction of the brain, and I don't want
to plant either of these misleading and stigmatised images of me in
readers' minds).

Is this version likely to work better as an introduction to a
philosophical forum?  Here goes:

In a word, I suppose I'm a mystic: a budding one, an extremely
undeveloped and confused one, lost in a world that seems dark,
strange, and threatening. In spite of this darkness, I believe in a
God who is immanent in each of us, universally loving, and an absolute
moral authority; however, I have no knowledge or opinion as to whether
this God created the universe, or is omnipotent.

I don't think I have ever believed in any supernatural events, not
since I was a small child, and still believed in Santa Claus.  I think
I have always, since then, been inclined to believe that no
supernatural events occur or ever have occurred, although, as with
God's supposed attributes, I don't claim total certainty about such
matters.  I was for all practical  purposes an atheist between the
ages of about 8 and 54, and am only gradually changing my views.

I do, however, believe in the existence of paranormal phenomena, and I
think that Jung's concept of synchronicity provides ample room for
such phenomena to occur, within what is called coincidence.

Philosophically, I believe that human beings are minds, not bodies;
and that it is not only a error, but damaging to human self-
confidence, to imagine that any amount of expert knowledge concerning
human bodies will ever give any human mind even the smallest knowledge
of another human mind, or of itself.  This belief about psychology is
independent of my belief in paranormal phenomena (which is something
of an intellectual embarrassment to me, but nevertheless doesn't seem
irrational).

What little education I have is in pure mathematics, although even
that is incomplete (in a more damning sense than that in which
everyone's education is always incomplete). I have also done a fair
amount of unsystematic and sporadic reading, over the years, on the
subject of mental illness (so called) and psychotherapy. I'm pretty
much open to suggestions of what to read in philosophy, although for
some reason it is quite a struggle for me to get through any books at
all these days.

I haven't studied philosophy formally, but I think I would like to
learn something about about Plato, Meister Eckhart, Locke, Kant,
Schopenhauer, Kierkegaard, Emerson, Bergson, William James, Mill,
Freud, Jung, Merleau-Ponty, Gabriel Marcel, Heidegger, Sartre, Popper,
Feyerabend, and Chomsky.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.


Reply via email to