Ah, again, your unsolicited and repugnant advisory, Gabs ? ! I suppose Ian's advisory is to address ideas or posts, not person.
Gabs, those informed of your history here know that you've had it with almost everyone here. I let you know another secret : you add almost nothing to ideas being discussed here. On Jan 18, 3:57 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > Deal, if you start adding a short footnote to each of your articles > that you intend to use the produced material for other purposes > elsewhere, too. We should think for the newbes, too. > > On 17 Jan., 21:28, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I agree. Lighten up! > > > On Jan 17, 1:47 pm, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Sorry, Slip, but I still don't get it. This is a discussion group. If > > > you post a comment and, especially, if you open a thread with it, it's > > > going to be discussed. > > > > Threads here frequently meander and I don't think most of us are > > > overly concerned about thread purity wards. If you post something for > > > "reasons ... which you didn't care to share at this time" then I > > > suppose you're going to have to reckon with (mis)interpretations. > > > > If Twirlip is the person who you perceive as stalking and harassing > > > you, then you're tending to oversensitivity ... in my opinion. > > > > Let's all lighten up a bit here, people ... > > > > Francis > > > > On 17 Jan., 20:35, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Mr. Fran; > > > > Whether it was posted privately or as public notice it still has > > > > nothing to do with anyone else. There was no need for people to > > > > comment on what they know nothing about nor what is perceived to be > > > > none of their business. > > > > > Molly had not problem with it, and you seem to have understood and had > > > > not taken any time to offer unwarranted comment. As you stated "I > > > > understand perfectly that you are not threatening Molly, rather > > > > withdrawing a permission previously given. That's fine." > > > > > The real problem is not the OP but that others for some reason want to > > > > interpret it differently and take it as an attack on Molly and then > > > > attack me. I have my reasons for issuing the statement which I don't > > > > care to share at this time. The thread has descended into chaos and > > > > now I'm being stalked and harassed by someone who wanted to be left > > > > alone. > > > > > The OP did not violate any laws or guidelines and neither does > > > > removing one's posts. A Public Notice is very common for legal > > > > statements and can be found in many newspapers and other media as > > > > public record. It does not warrant the public to post commentary in > > > > agreement or disagreement to the private legal matter. > > > > > I removed it and hope the issue sinks into the abyss, I will pursue > > > > other channels of communication with Molly over this matter. Thanks > > > > > On Jan 17, 1:00 pm, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jan 17, 11:03 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Look Allan, you don't know what you are talking about nor is your > > > > > > > interpretations of the thread post correct. > > > > > > > > Did you read any sentence that said Molly wronged me? Did you > > > > > > > read > > > > > > > any portion that implied a lawsuit? > > > > > > > > It was a request for Molly to discontinue using my M E posts on > > > > > > > her > > > > > > > blog, not a lawsuit. > > > > > > > > Molly understood it perfectly and in her First reply stated: > > > > > > > Slip at one time gave me permission to use his comments from this > > > > > > > group on my blog. now he is asking me not to use them. No > > > > > > > problem. > > > > > > > As a courtesy, I do not use material on my blog without > > > > > > > permission, > > > > > > > although the fair use copyright laws (as we have discussed > > > > > > > previously > > > > > > > in this group) are applicable. <molly > > > > > > > > SEE?? Can you READ? "now he is asking me not to use them"? > > > > > > > > If you don't know what you are talking about your should mind > > > > > > > your own > > > > > > > business. > > > > > > What the f**k? > > > > > > Slip, what are you trying to do here? First you start a thread, then > > > > > all your posts, including the initiating one, disappear. Well, I'm > > > > > going to comment anyway - to you. > > > > > > I understand perfectly that you are not threatening Molly, rather > > > > > withdrawing a permission previously given. That's fine. What strikes > > > > > me as being possibly disingenuous is the fact that you chose to do > > > > > this with an open thread and not - which, it seems to me, would have > > > > > been quite sufficient - with an e-mail to Molly directly. > > > > > > For this reason, I seem to get a faint whiff of shit stirring > > > > > somewhere. But then I may just be imagining things ... > > > > > > Francis- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
