Ah, again, your unsolicited and repugnant advisory, Gabs ? !  I
suppose Ian's advisory is to address ideas or posts, not person.

Gabs, those informed of your history here know that you've had it with
almost everyone here. I let you know another secret : you add almost
nothing to ideas being discussed here.

On Jan 18, 3:57 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
> Deal, if you start adding a short footnote to each of your articles
> that you intend to use the produced material for other purposes
> elsewhere, too. We should think for the newbes, too.
>
> On 17 Jan., 21:28, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I agree.  Lighten up!
>
> > On Jan 17, 1:47 pm, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Sorry, Slip, but I still don't get it. This is a discussion group. If
> > > you post a comment and, especially, if you open a thread with it, it's
> > > going to be discussed.
>
> > > Threads here frequently meander and I don't think most of us are
> > > overly concerned about thread purity wards. If you post something for
> > > "reasons ... which you didn't care to share at this time" then I
> > > suppose you're going to have to reckon with (mis)interpretations.
>
> > > If Twirlip is the person who you perceive as stalking and harassing
> > > you, then you're tending to oversensitivity ... in my opinion.
>
> > > Let's all lighten up a bit here, people ...
>
> > > Francis
>
> > > On 17 Jan., 20:35, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Mr. Fran;
> > > > Whether it was posted privately or as public notice it still has
> > > > nothing to do with anyone else.  There was no need for people to
> > > > comment on what they know nothing about nor what is perceived to be
> > > > none of their business.
>
> > > > Molly had not problem with it, and you seem to have understood and had
> > > > not taken any time to offer unwarranted comment. As you stated "I
> > > > understand perfectly that you are not threatening Molly, rather
> > > > withdrawing a permission previously given. That's fine."
>
> > > > The real problem is not the OP but that others for some reason want to
> > > > interpret it differently and take it as an attack on Molly and then
> > > > attack me.  I have my reasons for issuing the statement which I don't
> > > > care to share at this time.  The thread has descended into chaos and
> > > > now I'm being stalked and harassed by someone who wanted to be left
> > > > alone.
>
> > > > The OP did not violate any laws or guidelines and neither does
> > > > removing one's posts.  A Public Notice is very common for legal
> > > > statements and can be found in many newspapers and other media as
> > > > public record.  It does not warrant the public to post commentary in
> > > > agreement or disagreement to the private legal matter.
>
> > > > I removed it and hope the issue sinks into the abyss, I will pursue
> > > > other channels of communication with Molly over this matter.  Thanks
>
> > > > On Jan 17, 1:00 pm, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jan 17, 11:03 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Look Allan, you don't know what you are talking about nor is your
> > > > > > > interpretations of the thread post correct.
>
> > > > > > > Did you read any sentence that said Molly wronged me?  Did you 
> > > > > > > read
> > > > > > > any portion that implied a lawsuit?
>
> > > > > > > It was a request for Molly to discontinue using my M E posts on 
> > > > > > > her
> > > > > > > blog, not a lawsuit.
>
> > > > > > > Molly understood it perfectly and in her First reply stated:
> > > > > > > Slip at one time gave me permission to use his comments from this
> > > > > > > group on my blog.  now he is asking me not to use them.  No 
> > > > > > > problem.
> > > > > > > As a courtesy, I do not use material on my blog without 
> > > > > > > permission,
> > > > > > > although the fair use copyright laws (as we have discussed 
> > > > > > > previously
> > > > > > > in this group) are applicable. <molly
>
> > > > > > > SEE??  Can you READ?  "now he is asking me not to use them"?
>
> > > > > > > If you don't know what you are talking about your should mind 
> > > > > > > your own
> > > > > > > business.
>
> > > > > What the f**k?
>
> > > > > Slip, what are you trying to do here? First you start a thread, then
> > > > > all your posts, including the initiating one, disappear. Well, I'm
> > > > > going to comment anyway - to you.
>
> > > > > I understand perfectly that you are not threatening Molly, rather
> > > > > withdrawing a permission previously given. That's fine. What strikes
> > > > > me as being possibly disingenuous is the fact that you chose to do
> > > > > this with an open thread and not - which, it seems to me, would have
> > > > > been quite sufficient - with an e-mail to Molly directly.
>
> > > > > For this reason, I seem to get a faint whiff of shit stirring
> > > > > somewhere. But then I may just be imagining things ...
>
> > > > > Francis- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.


Reply via email to