I do sense the oneness expressed. Yes, this or that, neither.

On Jan 19, 10:48 pm, edward mason <[email protected]> wrote:
> When I read in the book of Micah 4:5, "For all people will walk in
> every one in the name  of his god, and we will walk in the name of the
> Lord our God for ever and ever", there's little doubt that religion
> plays onln a small role in a search for God.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Many, many, many years ago now, I desired to change an aspect of my
> > personality, after many years trying I found I had succeded.
>
> > I think for practical perposes, begin by living as the being you want
> > to be, try to say or do those things you envisage this 'new you'
> > saying and doing, after some time I found that I was no longer trying
> > to become the man I wanted to be, but I just was.
>
> > This prayer is actualy a big part of my life although of course I had
> > not known about it when I formulated the little lifes motto that
> > governes this aspect of life for me.  I put it this way.
>
> > 'There are things in life that you should get angry over, and there
> > are things in life where such anger is nowt but wasted energy.  So
> > only get angry when your anger can change the situation'
>
> > Hah yes at one point I was a very anger person indeed.
>
> > On 19 Jan, 11:42, Twirlip <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Someone recently mentioned this well-known prayer attributed to
> >> Reinhold Niebuhr (although this version is possibly slightly altered
> >> from the form in which he wrote it):
>
> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reinhold_Niebuhr
>
> >> "God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
> >> Courage to change the things I can change,
> >> And wisdom to know the difference."
>
> >> In respect of one's own self, how in practice does one recognise the
> >> difference between those two kinds of "thing"?
>
> >> Assume that a person wishes to change whatever about themselves should
> >> be changed. (Without that wish, there is nothing much to discuss.) If
> >> something about that person can be changed, will they come to have an
> >> understanding of that particular fault as if from a viewpoint higher
> >> or other than their own, at the same time as retaining their original
> >> point of view in a modified form?  On the other hand, if something
> >> about themselves cannot be changed, will they merely feel an opaque
> >> sense of irremediable guilt and despair, and no awareness of the fault
> >> as if from outside themselves, however hard and however long they try?
> >> And on the /other/ other hand, if something about a person genuinely
> >> cannot be changed, then can anything be said in general terms as to
> >> whether that defect might be a truly bad thing, or whether it can
> >> always be accepted as a part of that person, rather than a moral
> >> fault?  And finally, does belief in an omnipotent judgemental God tend
> >> to force all of a person's defects to be regarded as belonging to the
> >> second category, even when in fact they belong to the first category?
>
> >> (Of course, a person may feel opaque guilt and despair even about
> >> something that can in fact be changed, because they are clinging to
> >> their fault and failing or refusing to recognise it, but I am assuming
> >> that they have "the best will in the world", and know from experience
> >> that they are capable of recognising some things about themselves that
> >> can be changed.)
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.


Reply via email to