On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Alan Wostenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > The haiti disaster did not just kill people. It killed grass, too! > > But from the fact that grass died, nobody argues God is not. Why do > they argue that because people died, God is not? > > As Alexandar Pruss points out in http://bit.ly/7sSRUn "We are only > really bothered by the problem once we deal with critters that are > conscious and capable of sophisticated lives" Why is this?
Hmm. You are correct it is an illogical argument to assume there is no god because people or grass died. What some people think, I imagine, is that it proves if there is a god he is uncaring or possibly even cruel. Rather then put myself through the agony of believing the All Father doesn't give a rat's ass; I'd rather believe he doesn't exist at all. It's less emotionally taxing. I don't get angry. I think many angry so-called atheists aren't really atheists at all. They make the claim because they want to punish God and all who believe. Weird, eh? -Don > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
