Nobody argues the violent death of grases is evidence against a caring God. Why would they argue the violent death of people is evidence against caring God?
On Jan 23, 8:07 pm, fiddler <[email protected]> wrote: > You have no idea whether or not grasses are denying their fictional > gods. > > The problem here is that we are aware of only a single species that > invents gods: ours. > The terrible and violent death of people is not proof against god, it > is proof against a caring one. > When a theist provides evidence that the FSM doesn't exist, I'll > provide evidence that his little god doesn't either. I do rest > comfortably in the knowledge that something that has no effect on this > world, leaves no evidence in or on this world, or is claimed as > simultaneously loving and murderous toward this world most likely > doesn't exist. > > On Jan 23, 2:07 pm, Alan Wostenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The haiti disaster did not just kill people. It killed grass, too! > > > But from the fact that grass died, nobody argues God is not. Why do > > they argue that because people died, God is not? > > > As Alexandar Pruss points out inhttp://bit.ly/7sSRUn"We are only > > really bothered by the problem once we deal with critters that are > > conscious and capable of sophisticated lives" Why is this? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
