On 25 Jan, 16:17, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/1/25 Molly <[email protected]> > > > I, for one, welcome Pat's ideas and knowledge - all extensive. Like a > > breath of fresh air in this group, as he extends the boundaries of > > thinking with his kind treatment. > > I welcome Pat's ideas and knowledge too, which I hope was clear. That wasn't > my issue. > > Ian
It seems I've got under your collar and Lee's. As I'd mentioned in my response to Neil, perhaps I'll just spend more time writing the book, because, I'm really just re-hashing the same things these days and I can understand that can be both boring (as Neil says) and irritating (as it seems to be with you...probably because we hold differing opinions). If I focus on my book, then my audience WILL become larger. But one thing I'd like you to understand about me is that I feel very deeply that I have a moral obligation to have my concepts heard, because, if I'm correct, then it would best behove mankind to listen AND learn. Which is why, to those who do not want to learn my subject matter, I seem to be coming across 'increasingly didactic'. I think you, like Neil, are just getting bored by hearing the same old, same old. I'm not saying I'll go away completely, but, perhaps only interject occasionally, for it may be better to be a bit of spice than a heavy salting. ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
