We will never see the demise of literary works. People love to read but beyond that, cinematic and theatrical presentations could never represent the true content of the work. Much is left out and lost in the condensing necessary for movies and show, not to mention that imagination is then left to the interpretation of the screen writers. The popularity may wane but it won't die, not anytime soon.
On Mar 4, 3:14 am, Errol <[email protected]> wrote: > Cinema and theatre invoke expectation, even if it is simply an > expectation to be entertained, whereas novels require work from the > reader. Without the work, the novels are bland strings of text, dry as > dust, unrelated to the world. The eventual demise of the novel is > inevitable in a world where hours, minutes, even seconds are crucial > for profitability and success. Not enough time or inclination to do > non-profitable work. > > On Mar 4, 4:02 am, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > "If the novel goes the way of live theater – a medium appealing to > > only a small, relatively rarefied segment of the population – what, if > > anything, will be lost? What can a novel do for us that other art > > forms can’t?” > > >http://siobhancurious.wordpress.com/2010/03/02/encountering-the-other... > > > What do you think? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
