On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:21 AM, ornamentalmind <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Live free or die: Death is not the worst of evils.
>
>
> dj
>
>
> Rock 'n Roll Don!!!
>

\nn/  \nn/

dj


>
> On Mar 30, 6:33 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Where is Molly, by the way? I am reading a book on social
> > constructionism and all I hear is Molly. Need to concentrate more.
> >
> > On 30 Mrz., 14:44, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > First they came for the smokers, and then it was trans fats eaters.
>  Then
> > > they came for my hard liqueur and by then their was no one left to
> speak up
> > > for me.
> >
> > > *Live free or die: Death is not the worst of evils.
> >
> > > dj
> >
> > > *
> > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Chris Jenkins
> > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > > Ah Rigs, I love you.
> >
> > > > The SMOKING CAUSES LUNG CANCER OH MY GOD story has been going around
> so
> > > > long that people have really built up the correlation in their head
> as
> > > > truth. Smokers die of heart disease and emphysema (COPD). Lung Cancer
> is a
> > > > distant third for cause of death. Heart disease is also the leading
> killer
> > > > for heavy eaters of fried foods, and sedentary folks. The short and
> easy
> > > > explanation is that an unhealthy life will be a shorter life. That
> hasn't
> > > > stopped the anti-smoking crusades, though.
> >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:17 PM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > >> Amazing to think how many survived under the care of smokers,
> > > >> fireplaces, etc. I have known of lung cancer deaths where smoking
> was
> > > >> not a factor. What about drinkers or those who take drugs or strong
> > > >> meds and accidents/fatalities? What about junk food addicts and
> child
> > > >> health? What about all the taxes and court awards paid via tobacco?
> > > >> What if California passes legal marijuana? What if cell phones cause
> > > >> brain tumors? How long did Churchill live with all his cigars and
> > > >> brandy? Good grief!
> >
> > > >> On Mar 29, 8:19 pm, Ash <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > I am a smoker, and extend the moral question further that it has
> many
> > > >> > effects on the health and productivity of the smoker while
> impacting the
> > > >> > longevity of a parent, shortchanging the offspring in many ways
> less
> > > >> > directly than immediate exposure. That said, I feel guilt each
> time I
> > > >> > light up (~25/day) and am irritated at my weakness. Smoking
> anywhere
> > > >> > around children should be done with caution IMO even in open
> > > >> environments.
> >
> > > >> > On 3/24/2010 2:35 AM, fiddler wrote:
> >
> > > >> > > I saw that article. I believe that if a person wishes to smoke
> in
> > > >> > > their own vehicle, they should be allowed to do so. I support
> the less
> > > >> > > reaching ban, that disallows smoking in vehicles that drive
> children.
> > > >> > > I know plenty of people that smoke and would be quite horrified
> at
> > > >> > > being near children, much less transporting them lol. The strong
> ban
> > > >> > > on ALL vehicles is just silly IMO. Trying to prevent children
> from
> > > >> > > ever seeing a cigarette burning is taking government intrusion
> back
> > > >> > > into the middle ages...or the middle east.
> >
> > > >> > > On Mar 23, 11:28 pm, Ian Pollard<[email protected]>  wrote:
> >
> > > >> > >> Fiddler, your post is quite timely as the UK is looking to
> extend its
> > > >> > >> smoking band to cars with child passengers:
> >
> > > >> > >>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8583551.stm
> >
> > > >> > >> Ian- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > >> > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > >> --
> > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > >> ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]>
> <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > > >> .
> > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
> >
> > > >  --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > > ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]>
> <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > > > .
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

Reply via email to