I don't consider motivation as a precursor but many do.

On Apr 23, 10:27 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]>
wrote:
> “…Surely we can agree on something!” – rigsey
>
> Perhaps we can agree that it is impossible to know someone else’s
> motivation?
>
> On Apr 23, 5:21 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Yes, sometimes- but the larger point may be how power collects into
> > pockets and has less to do with historical models than basic human
> > drives and opportunism. For instance, one could parallel the federal
> > government with the ancien regimes and see the new aristrocracy/
> > courtiers as the bureaucrats, politicians and lawyers. A new
> > vocabulary doesn't change basic motives. The new clergy might be the
> > opinionated celebrities, shrinks and snake-oil wizards! :-) Surely we
> > can agree on something!
>
> > On Apr 22, 11:48 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > "...generally past civilizations depended on birthline, rank and
> > > class to design their social privileges and duties although merit
> > > sometimes played a part of an individual's/group's ability to rise." -
> > > rigsey
>
> > > So, in fact, it is a mixed bag then, right?
>
> > > On Apr 22, 7:10 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Well, they certainly did not promise liberty, etc. or the "American
> > > > Dream". Think of how many centuries relied on slave labor to build
> > > > those glorious temples, etc. and the best way to acquire slaves was
> > > > through war and conquest. And modern wars shifted to raw materials and
> > > > trade routes while the industrial-chemical-technological revolution
> > > > ushered in a new type of slave- paycheck or no. And though there were
> > > > women of privilege such as the chief wife or the mother of a ruler,
> > > > women as a rule were treated poorly plus were vulnerable physically in
> > > > childbirth and body strength. Some of our current social problems
> > > > might be traced to militant feminism and the shifting roles of men and
> > > > women in our society and, of course, once women can determine how to
> > > > control pregnancies, it's a brand new ballgame.To answer your
> > > > question, generally past civilizations depended on birthline, rank and
> > > > class to design their social privileges and duties although merit
> > > > sometimes played a part of an individual's/group's ability to rise.
>
> > > > On Apr 20, 10:44 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > “Ancient civilizations did not promise individual rights and
> > > > > freedoms…” – rigsey
>
> > > > > Are you saying that this is true for *all* civilizations?
>
> > > > > On Apr 20, 6:31 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Ancient civilizations did not promise individual rights and freedoms
> > > > > > but their power/control presented a certitude and order which could 
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > do-able and pleasant depending on class and caste. The castoffs are
> > > > > > still miserable in modern society- democracy or not. It is 
> > > > > > unrealistic
> > > > > > expectations that is the hard pill to swallow in our time or as
> > > > > > someone commented in a review of Evelyn Waugh- it is "pointless to
> > > > > > expect justice on earth, the ultimate moral reckoning comes only 
> > > > > > after
> > > > > > death" by Slobone- this notion attached to Catholicism, by the way.
>
> > > > > > On Apr 5, 8:29 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > “…which makes us enemies of each other The state is now bigger 
> > > > > > > than us
> > > > > > > mortal beings…” – PSK
>
> > > > > > > Yet again, I just don’t see it. How is ‘the state’ bigger today 
> > > > > > > than
> > > > > > > in, say, the days of Rome?...of ancient Egypt? And, I’m not so 
> > > > > > > sure it
> > > > > > > has to do with size either. I’m guessing the issue is perceived
> > > > > > > power. . . which, again, I just don’t see as being any more or 
> > > > > > > less
> > > > > > > than has been reported in the past
>
> > > > > > > On Apr 5, 6:56 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > In the last post an evolved Mind was being discussed…here’s 
> > > > > > > > what I
> > > > > > > > think…(it lacks structure...and very naive but please be
> > > > > > > > patient ...)
> > > > > > > > The Mind continues to evolve….It is a manifestation of the much 
> > > > > > > > larger
> > > > > > > > Process...The process from which we source the creation of 
> > > > > > > > intelligent
> > > > > > > > life. When one sees oneself in isolation from the Process arise 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > existential tendencies... An evolved mind I suppose is one with 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > open eye...the Minds eye... (One of the reasons I love this 
> > > > > > > > group is
> > > > > > > > the great name)…to put it simply there is the higher self and 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > lower self inside everyone...we are constantly pulled down by 
> > > > > > > > our
> > > > > > > > visceral and basic tendencies (lower self)...and not everyone 
> > > > > > > > cares to
> > > > > > > > realize their higher self..I guess that’s why great thinkers of 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > past incorporated their ideas into simple doctrines to follow 
> > > > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > they certainly had an idea of an evolved and enlightened 
> > > > > > > > society but
> > > > > > > > also knew that not every person is a philosopher so it was 
> > > > > > > > propagated
> > > > > > > > as religion a lifestyle which would earn you great spiritual 
> > > > > > > > dividends…
> > > > > > > > of course over time it got corrupted as a means of monopolizing 
> > > > > > > > power
> > > > > > > > over society by a learned few..That is one of the main problems 
> > > > > > > > of our
> > > > > > > > society today…we tend to forget the basic idea behind 
> > > > > > > > everything…and
> > > > > > > > let institutions get bigger than us…what began as an 
> > > > > > > > explanation for
> > > > > > > > unexplained phenomena (science being not so developed then) and 
> > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > attempt to enforce some moral code, has become bigger than 
> > > > > > > > us…rides
> > > > > > > > over us and is the plague of our times…a extra and outdated 
> > > > > > > > baggage
> > > > > > > > from the past…it has outgrown its relevance today…similarly the 
> > > > > > > > STATE…
> > > > > > > > which began as an attempt to organize social and political 
> > > > > > > > life…from
> > > > > > > > chiefdoms to countries it has transformed…and with it has grown 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > evil of patriotism(not to mention the violence to determine 
> > > > > > > > what is
> > > > > > > > the best way to organize political life)…which makes us enemies 
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > each other The state is now bigger than us mortal 
> > > > > > > > beings…Identities…
> > > > > > > > ethnicity…language…caste etc… we seem to need them to validate 
> > > > > > > > our
> > > > > > > > existence…the burning question of Who am I…I think I went a 
> > > > > > > > little off
> > > > > > > > the mark… what I want to say is that…The Mind ..Born out of flux
> > > > > > > > desperately seeks to find permanence(so its attachment to 
> > > > > > > > symbols)…as
> > > > > > > > the mind is the smaller functioning unit of the bigger Whole…it 
> > > > > > > > also
> > > > > > > > tries to establish itself while contributing to the 
> > > > > > > > ‘process’…thus
> > > > > > > > emerges our ego and sense of ‘self’…the Society is a collective 
> > > > > > > > body
> > > > > > > > of the individual units…also seeks the same permanence…and so it
> > > > > > > > creates institutions and preserves them…Change always comes In 
> > > > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > kind of revolution(similarly In an enlightened individual…he 
> > > > > > > > forms his
> > > > > > > > own individual ideas against what he has been brought up 
> > > > > > > > believing )…a
> > > > > > > > mutilation from the past…but occur it must…because permanency 
> > > > > > > > is not
> > > > > > > > the natural state of things…
> > > > > > > > There are I think certain universal truths which must be and are
> > > > > > > > arrived at…these are the key points of our evolution…they are 
> > > > > > > > arrived
> > > > > > > > at through the smaller individual units…taking the form of 
> > > > > > > > Einstein or
> > > > > > > > whatever;-)…like Molly mentioned communication is a very imp. 
> > > > > > > > Factor
> > > > > > > > for growth…the Mind does not grow in isolation…the society is 
> > > > > > > > really a
> > > > > > > > two way street I think…while the individual unit grows and 
> > > > > > > > evolves in
> > > > > > > > relation to it…it also acts as an oppressor of the individual… 
> > > > > > > > Don’t
> > > > > > > > worry Ash I think the symbols will evolve on their own….
> > > > > > > > What say my fellows?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > > > > > Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > > > > > [email protected].
> > > > > > For more options, visit this group 
> > > > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.-Hidequotedtext-
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > > > > Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > > > > [email protected].
> > > > > For more options, visit this group 
> > > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.-Hidequotedtext-
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > > > Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > > > [email protected].
> > > > For more options, visit this group 
> > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.-Hidequotedtext -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > > ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > > [email protected].
> > > For more options, visit this group 
> > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.-Hidequoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

Reply via email to