firey huh.. you must be a sagi. or a Leo;-).. ... Also... wat about zodiac signs ..i mean the outer charachteristics for each sign are pretty correct...at least i feel so...
On 5/30/10, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > You need a chart. The daily dollops are like Chinese fortune cookies.// > I have trouble with the houses and aspects but my chart is a good > profile. Of the elements I lack water- which explains my firey > pasionate personality! lol > > On May 30, 3:06 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > oh yeah.. entertaining..i read my horoscope at the end of each day and > > compare the events.. sumtyms they match;-) > > > > On 5/30/10, vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is, IMO : > > > > > 1) real > > > 2) fragment of truth > > > 3) completely irrational > > > 4) legitimate, through usage > > > 5) fluff feeding off people's uncertainties. > > > > > It is all of these. Perhaps, more ! Personally speaking, it does > > > entertain. > > > > > On May 30, 12:45 pm, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I was wondering if astrology is for real..i mean is there a fragment > > > > of truth in it.. even though it seems completely irrational...does > the > > > > fact that it has been there for ages give it legitimacy..or is it > pure > > > > fluff feeding off people uncertainties about life...- Hide quoted > text - > > > > - Show quoted text -
