Why magnetic fields? The standard suggestion is morphogenetic fields. Am I getting you right that it is communication and not language that somehow forms thinking process?
On 24 Jun., 04:35, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > How about Magnetic Fields? > > I think thinking is an innate human trait and evolves as soon as the > child's mind can grasp the rudiments of language, objects and persons- > even before he/she can speak. But the language can be other than words > also. So thinking is not confined to language unless it is necessary > to convey beyond the self. > > On Jun 23, 8:57 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I don't engage gravity as I have found it incongruous with my > > nature. > > > The nature of thought as you put it is highly complex and in need of > > volumes of discussion. Personally I've often wondered if thought is a > > product of the individual mind or a product of the collective > > consciousness or collective subconsciousness. I frequently find > > analogous value with radio wave or any other "out there" wave and the > > human mind. The question is.......who or what is really doing the > > thinking? > > > On Jun 23, 4:35 pm, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > first of all... has every one gravitated towards gravity or wat! ..few > > > people post here...Anyways.. so i was thinking .. and then i got > > > thinking about my thoughts.. i was wondering wat the nature of our > > > thoughts is.. i mean how would thoughts come to us if we had no > > > language.. or how did they come when we had no language.. i really > > > could not imagine...this is really rough and lame.. but i hope you > > > guys get the idea and post your thoughts about it.. (or maybe you > > > would ignore it and post at gravity instead...)- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -
