yeah thats wat.. it can be called instinct can it not.. now i have also wondered.. its really funny and stupid but.. wat is the mind of my rabbit occupied with.. when it just sits and stares into blank space...for hours.. not sleeping..only looking in one direction...or for that matter any animal in the empty period(not sleeping,eating, mating etc)..mostly pets.. coz in the wild i guess you have to be alert..
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 5:39 PM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe primary emotions spark the reptile brain? They evoke more of a > physical response/reaction. > > On Jun 24, 6:24 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Again another good question, one that I cannot answer except by asking > > another question. How do babies think? > > > > What of emotions too? Anger when felt contianes no vocalisation. > > > > On 24 June, 10:01, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > yes but its primary though.. i mean visual forms dont you think.. can a > > > person blind from birth have it though > > > > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:22 PM, [email protected] < > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Good question Pol. > > > > > > It does seem that when we think, when we engae with our internal > > > > diolouge that diolouge it is. > > > > > > Is this all of thought though? Can you for example hold a 3D picture > > > > in your head and twist it and turn it at your lesuire to examine it's > > > > angles and properties? Yes yes of course you can, is this also > > > > thought? > > > > > > I would have to say yes. > > > > > > On 24 June, 09:46, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Why magnetic fields? The standard suggestion is morphogenetic > fields. > > > > > > > Am I getting you right that it is communication and not language > that > > > > > somehow forms thinking process? > > > > > > > On 24 Jun., 04:35, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > How about Magnetic Fields? > > > > > > > > I think thinking is an innate human trait and evolves as soon as > the > > > > > > child's mind can grasp the rudiments of language, objects and > persons- > > > > > > even before he/she can speak. But the language can be other than > words > > > > > > also. So thinking is not confined to language unless it is > necessary > > > > > > to convey beyond the self. > > > > > > > > On Jun 23, 8:57 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I don't engage gravity as I have found it incongruous with my > > > > > > > nature. > > > > > > > > > The nature of thought as you put it is highly complex and in > need of > > > > > > > volumes of discussion. Personally I've often wondered if > thought is > > > > a > > > > > > > product of the individual mind or a product of the collective > > > > > > > consciousness or collective subconsciousness. I frequently > find > > > > > > > analogous value with radio wave or any other "out there" wave > and the > > > > > > > human mind. The question is.......who or what is really doing > the > > > > > > > thinking? > > > > > > > > > On Jun 23, 4:35 pm, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > first of all... has every one gravitated towards gravity or > wat! > > > > ..few > > > > > > > > people post here...Anyways.. so i was thinking .. and then i > got > > > > > > > > thinking about my thoughts.. i was wondering wat the nature > of our > > > > > > > > thoughts is.. i mean how would thoughts come to us if we had > no > > > > > > > > language.. or how did they come when we had no language.. i > really > > > > > > > > could not imagine...this is really rough and lame.. but i > hope you > > > > > > > > guys get the idea and post your thoughts about it.. (or maybe > you > > > > > > > > would ignore it and post at gravity instead...)- Hide quoted > text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > -- > > > \--/ Peace- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - -- \--/ Peace
