and is it not possible to celebrate that oneness in the multitudes.. why settle down.. i do not say.. have a string of affairs...wat i am saying here is.. that completeness can come by sharing with more than one.. two does not always have to form a single unit.. it can be three or four or watever...wat we are told mostly.. there is the one for you...but that is not wat i want to believe nor will i believe it.. it is circumstances that make us settle for one...
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:09 PM, vamadevananda <[email protected]>wrote: > The point, Kid, is in this oneness we see everywhere, as in apparent > unit systems such as you and I, a pond or mountain, a pig and a tree, > atom or organs. There is one - ness, unity, evident in each > individuation, having a form and qualities, properties and aspects, > character or personality ... individualised being. > > The diversity of such ' ones ' is mind boggling. But we come to see > their interconnections as we widen our scale of view, over space and > time. And lo, we discover other ' units ' in biospheres, Himalayas, > oceans, continents ... earth, solar systems, galaxies ... universe. > The universe is the One ... Universe. > > In the context of your post, ALL of us have problems with settling > down with one, or as One. But since they are each in the same line of > truth, some of us see the merit in each, try hard to retain in memory > all the time, untill the segregating or dissipating forces in our > psychic world relent and let our experience and understanding > complete. > > I have spoken of our higher nature and I am partial towards it. That's > when we are comfortable with one, as one. Studies in clinical > psychology and psychosomatics, yoga and meditation, confirm the > wellness it offers. That leaves you free and uncluttered, happy and > good. Even officials in the police department respect that. > > At any point in time, not everybody is capable of it; some might not > want it. And many are not aware of it, at least enough to choose > it ! > > On Jun 24, 2:36 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > and your point is?? > > > > On Jun 23, 1:33 am, vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Do you know what a system ( closed or open ) is, Kid ? > > > > > The Universe is a system ( not sure if it closed or open ), in which > > > everything else is included. It is One, quite apart from each being or > > > all beings it includes, not excluding the ones now or yet unmanifest ! > > > > > On Jun 22, 1:26 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I have a hard time believing when someone tells me that they have > > > > found the one... what does it mean anyway..The one.. why does it > thave > > > > to be one...I believe that people can and do fall in love with more > > > > than one person at the same time...and that is why i am opposed to > > > > marriage as an institution...a promise to be with each other > > > > forever!...I think open relationships are much better..there is no > > > > emotional burden...Also sexual and emotional intimacy does not always > > > > have to be in one single package.. i do not see adultery as something > > > > horrible...and i really resented the way media made an example of > > > > Tiger woods and his many affairs...so wat he slept with many women.. > > > > its not like they didnt know who he was and that he was married...The > > > > fact that religion penetrated and dictated every aspect of individual > > > > lives still shows its effects...sex is something sacred and at the > > > > same time tabboed(although some countries have come to take liberal > > > > views there are still many orthodox societies)... its a natural > > > > instinct why make something else out of it...its like hunger..The > more > > > > you try to regulate it the more you pervert it...the fact that > > > > teenagers are told to abstain should only be because of health > reasons > > > > not because premarital sex is a sin...It was because that religion > > > > first dictated that homosexuality is immoral that subsequent legal > > > > bans on it followed.. and it is still so ingrained in society that > > > > most homosexuals have a hard life..only because of one aspect of > their > > > > individuality... As for monogamy i really dont think it is a > universal > > > > truth...i mean it was fine when the mortality rate was around 50 you > > > > could stick around with one.. but things are changing... And with the > > > > society must evolve its institutions and the values related to these > > > > institutions ... So after all this rambling all id like to say is > that > > > > the society should rethink its basic elements which it takes for > > > > granted ...i dont mean to offend all you happily married people out > > > > there.. just a private opinion.. and I'd like to know wat you all > > > > think..- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > -- \--/ Peace
