You have to take your own journey forward, your way, with your desires and ideas, and your suppositions or beliefs. That learning curve can hardly be progressed upon by wishing, opinionation or argumentation on a discussion forum. Make your choices, have the experience, and know and conclude for yourself !
I've stated my conclusions, from my experience and understanding. On Jun 25, 11:19 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > and is it not possible to celebrate that oneness in the multitudes.. why > settle down.. i do not say.. have a string of affairs...wat i am saying here > is.. that completeness can come by sharing with more than one.. two does not > always have to form a single unit.. it can be three or four or watever...wat > we are told mostly.. there is the one for you...but that is not wat i want > to believe nor will i believe it.. it is circumstances that make us settle > for one... > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:09 PM, vamadevananda <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > The point, Kid, is in this oneness we see everywhere, as in apparent > > unit systems such as you and I, a pond or mountain, a pig and a tree, > > atom or organs. There is one - ness, unity, evident in each > > individuation, having a form and qualities, properties and aspects, > > character or personality ... individualised being. > > > The diversity of such ' ones ' is mind boggling. But we come to see > > their interconnections as we widen our scale of view, over space and > > time. And lo, we discover other ' units ' in biospheres, Himalayas, > > oceans, continents ... earth, solar systems, galaxies ... universe. > > The universe is the One ... Universe. > > > In the context of your post, ALL of us have problems with settling > > down with one, or as One. But since they are each in the same line of > > truth, some of us see the merit in each, try hard to retain in memory > > all the time, untill the segregating or dissipating forces in our > > psychic world relent and let our experience and understanding > > complete. > > > I have spoken of our higher nature and I am partial towards it. That's > > when we are comfortable with one, as one. Studies in clinical > > psychology and psychosomatics, yoga and meditation, confirm the > > wellness it offers. That leaves you free and uncluttered, happy and > > good. Even officials in the police department respect that. > > > At any point in time, not everybody is capable of it; some might not > > want it. And many are not aware of it, at least enough to choose > > it ! > > > On Jun 24, 2:36 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > and your point is?? > > > > On Jun 23, 1:33 am, vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Do you know what a system ( closed or open ) is, Kid ? > > > > > The Universe is a system ( not sure if it closed or open ), in which > > > > everything else is included. It is One, quite apart from each being or > > > > all beings it includes, not excluding the ones now or yet unmanifest ! > > > > > On Jun 22, 1:26 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I have a hard time believing when someone tells me that they have > > > > > found the one... what does it mean anyway..The one.. why does it > > thave > > > > > to be one...I believe that people can and do fall in love with more > > > > > than one person at the same time...and that is why i am opposed to > > > > > marriage as an institution...a promise to be with each other > > > > > forever!...I think open relationships are much better..there is no > > > > > emotional burden...Also sexual and emotional intimacy does not always > > > > > have to be in one single package.. i do not see adultery as something > > > > > horrible...and i really resented the way media made an example of > > > > > Tiger woods and his many affairs...so wat he slept with many women.. > > > > > its not like they didnt know who he was and that he was married...The > > > > > fact that religion penetrated and dictated every aspect of individual > > > > > lives still shows its effects...sex is something sacred and at the > > > > > same time tabboed(although some countries have come to take liberal > > > > > views there are still many orthodox societies)... its a natural > > > > > instinct why make something else out of it...its like hunger..The > > more > > > > > you try to regulate it the more you pervert it...the fact that > > > > > teenagers are told to abstain should only be because of health > > reasons > > > > > not because premarital sex is a sin...It was because that religion > > > > > first dictated that homosexuality is immoral that subsequent legal > > > > > bans on it followed.. and it is still so ingrained in society that > > > > > most homosexuals have a hard life..only because of one aspect of > > their > > > > > individuality... As for monogamy i really dont think it is a > > universal > > > > > truth...i mean it was fine when the mortality rate was around 50 you > > > > > could stick around with one.. but things are changing... And with the > > > > > society must evolve its institutions and the values related to these > > > > > institutions ... So after all this rambling all id like to say is > > that > > > > > the society should rethink its basic elements which it takes for > > > > > granted ...i dont mean to offend all you happily married people out > > > > > there.. just a private opinion.. and I'd like to know wat you all > > > > > think..- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > -- > \--/ Peace
