yeah gravity is just too much aint it.. i cant focus on one thing.. and end up posting nothing..
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 7:44 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > I am so stupid with Gravity that it swamps me and I can't be bothered > with it. I hope someone will let me know if it ever gets any good. I > am confused on the nature of thought, to the extent it only makes > sense to me that most people don't do much of it and are generally > discouraged from it. > > On 24 June, 17:25, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > Maybe this film might be worth a look: > http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110246/ > > Dedicated to those who want to keep on believing that a child's brain > > is ready to process information as soon as the father has seen the > > child to now build the world for it. > > > > On 24 Jun., 14:07, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Yes- I thought about brain damage and autism as examples also. But the > > > isolated child with a healthy brain can still make mental connections > > > without a formal language and even crying or cooing can be considered > > > attempts at communicating- at least I think it so. > > > > > On Jun 24, 3:56 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > ok... wat about .. suppose there is a child.. grown up in > isolation..without > > > > communication so doesnt have a language.. how would his thoughts come > to him > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:05 AM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > How about Magnetic Fields? > > > > > > > I think thinking is an innate human trait and evolves as soon as > the > > > > > child's mind can grasp the rudiments of language, objects and > persons- > > > > > even before he/she can speak. But the language can be other than > words > > > > > also. So thinking is not confined to language unless it is > necessary > > > > > to convey beyond the self. > > > > > > > On Jun 23, 8:57 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I don't engage gravity as I have found it incongruous with my > > > > > > nature. > > > > > > > > The nature of thought as you put it is highly complex and in need > of > > > > > > volumes of discussion. Personally I've often wondered if thought > is a > > > > > > product of the individual mind or a product of the collective > > > > > > consciousness or collective subconsciousness. I frequently find > > > > > > analogous value with radio wave or any other "out there" wave and > the > > > > > > human mind. The question is.......who or what is really doing > the > > > > > > thinking? > > > > > > > > On Jun 23, 4:35 pm, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > first of all... has every one gravitated towards gravity or > wat! ..few > > > > > > > people post here...Anyways.. so i was thinking .. and then i > got > > > > > > > thinking about my thoughts.. i was wondering wat the nature of > our > > > > > > > thoughts is.. i mean how would thoughts come to us if we had no > > > > > > > language.. or how did they come when we had no language.. i > really > > > > > > > could not imagine...this is really rough and lame.. but i hope > you > > > > > > > guys get the idea and post your thoughts about it.. (or maybe > you > > > > > > > would ignore it and post at gravity instead...)- Hide quoted > text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > -- > > > > \--/ Peace- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > -- \--/ Peace
