Ah well, Slip. All I can say is wait and see. You're young enough you'll live to see and enjoy the new world at least begin to bloom and hopefully longer than that (barring unwarranted accidents, that is). Not everyone is as blind as you think.
On Jul 8, 6:53 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > Gruff, we are only conditioned by years of orthodoxy issued to the > commons by dictates and further accepted as norm by the commons, > therefore any variance from that establishment seems ludicrous and > outlandish but with clearer perspective you should easily see that > those in the position of isolation would obviously have personal > ownership of transport. > I see this as a core problem in formulating law, ie; generalizing law > in a blanket approach when there are specifics to be addressed. > The cities are congested and most are polluted as well so these are > the places that are subjective to end means resolution. Eventually > many cities will require vehicles to dock their transport outside and > take public transport within as a understandable measure against grid > lock, ie, vehicular overcrowding. It is really simple math. Imagine > a swimming pool designed to accommodate 200 people but 500 show up and > get in the pool; the rest is history. Do you want to take a bath with > 499 other people? Same has it for cars! > China will fail and they will completely pollute the planet. Their > green measures will prove to be insufficient by means of ratio. It is > simply a matter of time that the reality of "too much" rears it's ugly > head.
