while it is hard to understand how time moves, it "seems" that it must. light, sound, heat all move. and while we can not "see" or witness the movement of time, that probably demonstrates our limitation rather than times lack of mobility. history indicates that the human animal suffers from serial arrogance, always thinking that what we know is all there is to know.
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 01:21:22 +0530 Subject: Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: Parallel Universes From: [email protected] To: [email protected] I suppose i used the wrong word.. rooted.. wat i was trying to explain was that...there is no movement through time..movement can only be comprehended when we see it in relation to our memory...otherwise there are countless 'nows'...like RP said somewhere no present and no future..i agree with your worm apple explanation... as for cyclical nature of events...i guess through observing that also can we feel 'movement'...and also that it is contained.. on the other hand the linear concept i find intimidating personally..and overwhelming...faulty reasoning maybe;-) On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Deane Kellison <[email protected]> wrote: your description of time as a river is intriguing. but i believe we are not rooted, but move at our own speed. similar to Einstein's description of a person and a train in the theory of relativity. much seems to come back to the human mind trying to describe or comprehend items and concepts that it is a small part of. makes me wonder if I am simply a worm inside an apple - how could a worm comprehend the apple and beyond? Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Learn more. -- \--/ Peace _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
