On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:55 AM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> Time is a sense of elapsing , as something which precedes and something > which follows that which we are experiencing at the moment. A universe that > precedes and that which follows a present universe and the one to which it > is experienced is in a parallel universe. > > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 7:02 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I have found it valuable to consider the concept and experience of time >> from two different perspectives. These two perspectives are linear time and >> durational time. Linear time is conventional clock time with there existing >> a felt sense of past time, present here and now time, and future time. >> >> Durational time is equivalent to vacation, and childhood time experienced >> as timelessness. >> >> These two senses of time sometimes coincide as in the experience of lucid >> dreaming, and in experiences such as that of Proust in Remembrances of Time >> Past. Here both circles of time overlap. >> >> My personal sense is that there is in fact no time. As human beings we >> fill perceived emptiness with meanings. >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: pol.science kid <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Tue, Jul 20, 2010 6:42 am >> Subject: Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: Parallel Universes >> >> i thought of continuing in the same thread becoz it seems connected to >> it...what are your ideas about time..i mean your experience of it...when i >> htought about it , i felt.. well i'll explain it this way.. its as though i >> am standing in a river.. facing the current..and the water just flows flows >> beneath me.. and i am rooted to the same spot...this making of time.. or >> objectifying it.. it distorts a lot doesnt it...i mean when you say there is >> not enuf time.. how can that be...we have all the Time we need...my thoughts >> are confused and unclear..but i'd like you all to say something... >> >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:04 AM, pol.science kid >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> wow..that was an argument over the 'eye'.. so why dont they use the color >>> wheel? how do you know its plastic..;-) >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:56 AM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, shades of mind is good. Better than this monochrome blue plastic >>>> eye, like I said: >>>> >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye/browse_frm/thread/b34c37072ddda478/85e1846e157e3bdf?lnk=gst&q=goethe+#85e1846e157e3bdf >>>> >>>> On 19 Jul., 17:45, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > Perhaps as in moderators can be shady at times? :P Shades of mind is >>>> > an interesting concept though! >>>> > >>>> > On Jul 19, 1:03 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > shades?.. really?... in what sense...you mean shades of mind..? i >>>> didnt >>>> > > really give it an actual thought except for taking it at face >>>> > > value;-)..becoz i found it interesting..you can illuminate it for >>>> me.. >>>> > >>>> > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:24 AM, gabbydott <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > > > now that I hear you saying it, it could somehow be related to >>>> shade >>>> > > > concept, what do you sense? >>>> > >>>> > > > On 18 Jul., 09:19, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > > > > a differing shame concept........wow.... >>>> > >>>> > > > > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 5:30 PM, gabbydott < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> > > > > > A quality person? Is that the opposite of a quantity person? >>>> Also I >>>> > > > > > don't see what Fier ought to feel ashamed of. I interpreted >>>> the blog >>>> > > > > > link in the given context as a reference to find further >>>> information/ >>>> > > > > > reasons/proof. A clear case of transparency lived. Whereas >>>> I've >>>> > > > > > learned to accept the hidden blog-interest-communication as >>>> part of a >>>> > > > > > culture that knows why it has a differing shame concept. >>>> > >>>> > > > > > On 17 Jul., 09:34, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > > > > > > Molly is a very fine and quality person, and she is right >>>> about your >>>> > > > > > > shameless self promotion, It has been my experience here >>>> that most >>>> > > > people >>>> > > > > > > that stay around have a special talent. The name calling you >>>> are >>>> > > > doing is >>>> > > > > > > really more a reflection of your self.. because what you >>>> said about >>>> > > > the >>>> > > > > > > moderators, well they fit in many categories but not those >>>> you >>>> > > > listed. >>>> > > > > > the >>>> > > > > > > path to wisdom begins first by ,, - - - never mind you know >>>> it >>>> > > > everything >>>> > > > > > > already. >>>> > > > > > > Allan >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Fiercely Free < >>>> [email protected]> >>>> > > > wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > On Jul 14, 9:30 pm, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > > > > > > > > Just to clarify, FF, Minds Eye does not have a problem >>>> with links >>>> > > > > > > > > other than the ones used as a signature in a post to >>>> direct folks >>>> > > > to >>>> > > > > > > > > your personal website. This is what is generally >>>> considered >>>> > > > shameless >>>> > > > > > > > > self promotion or spam in internet groups. We otherwise >>>> like >>>> > > > links >>>> > > > > > > > > that give more info (or humor) to the discussion. >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > Your mindless usage of the words like shameless self >>>> promotion etc. >>>> > > > > > > > clearly reflects the abysmally low quality of atheist >>>> education >>>> > > > > > > > system. Entire squad moderators on this Minds-Eye group >>>> seems to be >>>> > > > a >>>> > > > > > > > group of hopelessly INCOMPETENT STUPID LOAFERS, having no >>>> > > > common-sense >>>> > > > > > > > at all. Minds-Eye moderators are not consistent. I will >>>> quote a >>>> > > > > > > > comment from one of the Minds-Eye moderators >>>> "vamadevanada" (May >>>> > > > 18, >>>> > > > > > > > 2010) : >>>> > > > > > > > I know. And I have access to libraries. It means >>>> nothing, in >>>> > > > the >>>> > > > > > > > course of a discussion. >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > Here, you do not offer books or blogs in the middle of >>>> a >>>> > > > > > > > conversation. >>>> > > > > > > > You only put across yourself, what you know and have >>>> to say, in >>>> > > > > > > > terms >>>> > > > > > > > and using words I can understand. And I suppose I >>>> speak for >>>> > > > > > > > everyone >>>> > > > > > > > here. >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > Your affinity towards moderated world is in proportion to >>>> your >>>> > > > > > > > mediocrity. You are lucky because it is only my decency >>>> which is >>>> > > > > > > > preventing me from using unparlimentary words that start >>>> with >>>> > > > alphabet >>>> > > > > > > > "f". Otherwise worthless egotist intellectual morons like >>>> you do >>>> > > > not >>>> > > > > > > > deserve anything else than that. >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > Note : I can give you the link to the above mentioned >>>> comment of >>>> > > > > > > > moderator. But that also may not be in line with the >>>> meaningless >>>> > > > > > > > guideline of Minds-Eye group. >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > On Jul 14, 11:46 am, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > On Jul 14, 1:43 am, DarkwaterBlight < >>>> [email protected]> >>>> > > > > > wrote:> >>>> > > > > > > > At any rate, FF, bipolar coordinates are used for 2 >>>> dimensional >>>> > > > > > > > > > > illustrations and bipolar system is a term coined by >>>> Kaplan. >>>> > > > "A >>>> > > > > > loose >>>> > > > > > > > > > > bipolar system is a construct in international >>>> relations >>>> > > > posited >>>> > > > > > by >>>> > > > > > > > > > > theorist Morton Kaplan in his work "System and >>>> Process in >>>> > > > > > > > > > > International Politics." The model was largely meant >>>> to >>>> > > > reflect >>>> > > > > > the >>>> > > > > > > > > > > Cold War-era, two-superpower geopolitical >>>> arrangement." >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > The bipolar system forms the basis of >>>> civilization. >>>> > > > > > > > > > Fundamentally, it represents the conflict between the >>>> good & >>>> > > > the >>>> > > > > > bad. >>>> > > > > > > > > > It can be applied to global political system as well. >>>> Then why >>>> > > > do >>>> > > > > > such >>>> > > > > > > > > > politically interpreted versions of bipolar system >>>> appear to be >>>> > > > > > > > > > inadequate ? Reason is obvious. Those who proposed >>>> such >>>> > > > political >>>> > > > > > > > > > theories were NOT as neutral as they were supposed to >>>> be. It is >>>> > > > the >>>> > > > > > > > > > ignorance of those who interprete. Basic bipolar model >>>> cannot >>>> > > > not >>>> > > > > > be >>>> > > > > > > > > > blamed for that. >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > Are you suggesting that our universe is a folded 2D >>>> universe >>>> > > > > > giving >>>> > > > > > > > the >>>> > > > > > > > > > > appearance of a multiverse for lack of a good >>>> vantage point?! >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > In the absence of true infinity, multiverse >>>> system will >>>> > > > never >>>> > > > > > > > > > become multipolar system. >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > Read more: What Is a Loose Bipolar System? | >>>> eHow.comhttp:// >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> www.ehow.com/facts_6529365_loose-bipolar-system_.html#ixzz0tb4... >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the reference link, DarkwaterBlight. >>>> (You have >>>> > > > > > shown >>>> > > > > > > > > > the courage to go against Minds-Eye guidelines >>>> regarding >>>> > > > links.) >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 1:12 pm, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 6:45 pm, DarkwaterBlight < >>>> > > > [email protected]> >>>> > > > > > > > wrote:> Samir, I like your blog! Yes I am sure few would >>>> agree that >>>> > > > you >>>> > > > > > are >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > the most intelligent person on this globe. Your >>>> post >>>> > > > implies >>>> > > > > > > > duality >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > and I am sure reason would suggest that duality >>>> is but an >>>> > > > > > > > illusion. >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > The mutiverse concept is provided for in quantum >>>> physics >>>> > > > as >>>> > > > > > well >>>> > > > > > > > as >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > other advanced theories but all fall short of >>>> PROVING >>>> > > > > > anything >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > therefore these multi layers can ONLY exist in >>>> Minds-Eye >>>> > > > > > space as >>>> > > > > > > > far >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > as we are concerned! The fact that this world is >>>> > > > competitive >>>> > > > > > and >>>> > > > > > > > will >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > always challenge claims made by those who oppose >>>> is not >>>> > > > an >>>> > > > > > issue. >>>> > > > > > > > The >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > issue is being able to support claims made and >>>> > > > persevering. >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > I see no duality or subsequent illusion in my >>>> post. My >>>> > > > > > > > objection >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > was for the term "Infinite" and in the absence of >>>> infinite >>>> > > > > > layers, >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > multiverse system will NOT be different from >>>> bipolar >>>> > > > system. >>>> > > > > > So, >>>> > > > > > > > now >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > the onus of supporting claims about "infinite >>>> number of >>>> > > > layers >>>> > > > > > on >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > Minds-Eye" rests upon the organisers of >>>> Minds-Eye... >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 8:23 am, Fiercely Free < >>>> [email protected]> >>>> > > > wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any multiverse system will eventually >>>> boil down >>>> > > > to a >>>> > > > > > > > bipolar >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > system. You are either part of Truth axis or >>>> you are >>>> > > > part >>>> > > > > > of >>>> > > > > > > > organised >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > crime. There is no scope for any third option. >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only omnipotent Almighty is infinite. >>>> So, >>>> > > > Minds-Eye >>>> > > > > > space >>>> > > > > > > > cannot >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > have infinite layers. If you assume yourselves >>>> to be >>>> > > > > > infinite, >>>> > > > > > > > in this >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > fiercely competitive world, your claim will >>>> always get >>>> > > > > > > > challenged... >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fromhttp://samirsp.blogspot.com >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 3, 5:15 pm, RP <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Parallel spaceMinds-Eye - 2 posts - 2 >>>> authors - >>>> > > > Last >>>> > > > > > > > post: Mar >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 12, 2008 >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rp singh ... Minds-Eye Space has infinite >>>> layers and >>>> > > > in >>>> > > > > > each >>>> > > > > > > > layer >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there is a unique universe. Time has no >>>> beginning and >>>> > > > no >>>> > > > > > end >>>> > > > > > > > as the >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > past is ... >>>> > >>>> > > > >>>> http://groups.google.com/g/3517fe0c/t/fca83d2320a90343/d/df18f534e5c8. >>>> > > > > > .. >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wrote about parallel universes in ME as >>>> above. I am >>>> > > > > > hearing >>>> > > > > > > > a lot >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about parallel universes nowadays whereas >>>> when I >>>> > > > > > expounded my >>>> > > > > > > > belief I >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > was ridiculed. Is it just co-incidence?- >>>> Hide quoted >>>> > > > text >>>> > > > > > - >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > -- >>>> > > > > > > ( >>>> > > > > > > ) >>>> > > > > > > I_D Allan >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > Be Paranoid. >>>> > > > > > > God is always building a better idiot!!! >>>> > >>>> > > > > -- >>>> > > > > \--/ Peace >>>> > >>>> > ... >>>> > >>>> > Erfahren Sie mehr ยป >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> \--/ Peace >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> \--/ Peace >> > >
