Hey Lee, but you know me! Now isn't that a progress? I'm all against this internal wischiwaschi and will keep on fighting for speaking things out the way they present themselves to me.
On 5 Aug., 12:26, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > I think I disagree. > > In my little part of the world it seems that people are haveing less > to do with each other, I barely know my neigbours, we are still > fighting in Afganistan and Iraq, religious fundematlisim may be on the > rise. > > No I see little evidance of any evolution of relationships, and see > some for the opposite. > > On 3 Aug, 13:46, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > All aspects of human civilization—language, art, aesthetics, > > technology, architecture, organizations, governments—depend upon > > essential human relationships for their evolution and expression. > > > * Question: What is actually evolving? > > > * Answer: The quality and quantity of relationships between people, > > assuming the form of shared meanings, agreements, relationships and > > groups of relationships. The cultural domain is inter-subjective, > > because it exists between subjects, yet is often not objectively > > identifiable. But the fact that these shared spaces of meaning are not > > objectively identifiable does not hinder us from experiencing them as > > being real. As such, the subjective world includes not only individual > > consciousness but the inter-subjective domain of relationships as > > well, making the interior universe much more substantial. These > > relationships are real, yet they exist in the internal universe. The > > evolution of this internal universe accounts for the fact that women, > > children, and minorities now experience and possess more freedoms than > > in any time in written history. > > > What do YOU think? > > > For more: http://www.i-awake.net/2010/08/spiral-dynamics-introduction.html
