I agree that these are applicable across the board but do not appear
to be very new to me. IMO #1,#3 and #4 most applicable in effecting
any great change and #2 being the force behind it. #5 Can easily be
misinterpreted and taken to a level of obscenity. Truly I run the
spectrum, not unlike anyone and everyone, my transparency can be taken
as indiscretion and rightly so many times. I am not that high
minded(or otherwise) to think I am at any degree higher or lower than
my neighbor. My first responses were intended as light hearted ones in
spite of myself.

On Aug 9, 11:22 am, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, I think that Richard David Hames' book, Five Literacies of
> Global Leadership IS as applicable to the corporate world as Thomas
> Kuhn's "Structure of Scientific 
> Revolutions."http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/thomas-kuhn/
> did applied to science, but also to life change.  In otherwords, it is
> applicable there, and everywhere else, especially on an individual
> basis. When Kuhn first published his work on scientific paradigms and
> paradigm shifts in 1962, it was (to his surprise) actually corporate
> America that embraced it, teaching it to employees as a way to manage
> the rapidly changing work environment.  As a result, Kuhn republished
> his book with a final chapter, differentiating between presenting
> oneself or organization as making a paradigm shift, and actually doing
> so.  Hence the cliche - "you have to walk the walk, not just talk the
> talk."
>
> It really does shed light on how much our responses and actions reveal
> about us.  It is ultimately true, we are more than our responses.  But
> when we are acting out a psychodrama, creating our victims, villians,
> heros in an oppositional and defiant way - our responses say more than
> we know.  We can tell the world from now until doomsday that we have
> shifted paradigms, but when our actions and personal culture say
> otherwise, we are only fooling ourselves.
>
> To me, these five literacies can be deeply personal, and when truly
> integrated, can not only shift our paradigm, but lead the way for
> those around us.
>
> On Aug 9, 10:32 am, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Derailment was far from my intent but the title of the thread is
> > misleading. I was looking at sheer numbers before even adressing the
> > skills. The fact that I am a little apprehensive of women is due to my
> > experiences but neither my apprehensiveness or my experiences
> > completely define me and nor do my responses. The skills posted above
> > seem to me a bit generic at first glance. More geared toward corporate
> > leadership and marketing.
>
> > On Aug 9, 9:25 am, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Somehow the word "girl" in the subject has thrown this thread off
> > > course to its original topic, 21st century leadership skills, because
> > > clearly, the posts are beginning to lack "Deep Design (the ability to
> > > create wisdom through dialogue)." Perhaps it was my mistake in
> > > personalizing the subject line, but these skills are required cross
> > > gender, and so is leadership.  I am not restricting my response to the
> > > posts in this group, I mean truly, it is important to find it within
> > > ourselves to provide the leadership, in our families, communities, and
> > > beyond.  It begins with each response we offer, and we offer responses
> > > in relationship to others.  Whether we are taking the role of the
> > > destroyer, and intending to cause upset or derailment with our
> > > responses - or the role of creator, and seeking connection - the
> > > response is ours and ours alone, defining who we are and how we live.
>
> > > On Aug 9, 9:11 am, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > According to Census 2000, 281.4 million people were counted in the
> > > > United States — 143.4 million of whom were female and 138.1 million
> > > > male.1 The former made up 50.9 percent of the population, compared
> > > > with 51.3 percent in 1990.
> > > > Information on gender was derived from a question which was asked of
> > > > all people. A question on the sex of individuals was included in all
> > > > censuses since the first one in 1790.
>
> > > > On Aug 9, 8:46 am, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > I was told by a wise drunk that women would rule the world. His
> > > > > reasoning was; "They already have all the pussy and thier entitled to
> > > > > half of all the money!"
>
> > > > > On Aug 8, 11:51 am, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > and so, we run the spectrum!
>
> > > > > > On Aug 8, 9:25 am, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > So true!
>
> > > > > > > On Aug 8, 9:04 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > I think a man needs girls with skills.
>
> > > > > > > > On Aug 5, 7:23 am, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Author and futurist David Hames has written a book called the 
> > > > > > > > > Five
> > > > > > > > > Literacies of Global Leadership, in which he identifies these 
> > > > > > > > > as :
> > > > > > > > > # Networked Intelligence (the ability to connect with others 
> > > > > > > > > & express
> > > > > > > > > the complexity of the ecosystem)
> > > > > > > > > # Futuring (the ability to visualize & imagine future 
> > > > > > > > > possibilities)
> > > > > > > > > # Strategic Navigation (the ability to learn to adapt as fast 
> > > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > change itself)
> > > > > > > > > # Deep Design (the ability to create wisdom through dialogue)
> > > > > > > > > # Brand Resonance (the ability to create attention that 
> > > > > > > > > awakens your
> > > > > > > > > unique value in others)
>
> > > > > > > > > What do you think about these "skills needed to adapt to 21st 
> > > > > > > > > centruy
> > > > > > > > > life?"- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to