"... On Aug 16, 7:11 pm, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: ..."
> Gruff you are simply an organism which is perishable and has limitations. > You are arguing with so much authority as if you had all the answers to the > complex nature of this universe and the abstract idea of God. Whatever you > are saying is a product of your reason and your reason is not infallible as > it has its limitations Gosh, RP. You seem to have difficulty making up your mind while at the same time you also seem to have spurred your ego into a heated lather where you rather blindly attack with empty words. > All your arguments are baseless as you seem to > believe in a sourceless creation , which is wrong as it had to come out of > something intelligent as it has intelligent design. I think you are making assumptions which are baseless aside from your arrogance and disdain for anyone who does not take your high-sounding words as gospel. > We are all intelligent > beings and if you believe that the source is something dead and without > intelligence you are wrong my friend as intelligence can only be begot by > intelligence. Well, clearly we are not all intelligent nor perceptive. I don't think I ever said that the source of life is something dead. I merely pointed out the truth that we do not know what lies beyond the Big Bang. > You ask me why is my one God viable and I ask you why is your > no God viable. Is this your only answer? To ask the same question back? That seems to show a lack of ability to answer a simple question. I asked why you consider your one god viable in the face of the ancient Greek gods in light of the fact that the ancient Greeks are time honored as being highly intelligent and wise. > What makes you think that you are absolutely right , for not > even once you have admitted to an iota of doubt. I believe I have used such terms as I believe, I think, it seems to me, etc. etc., which are qualifiers for what follows and at the very least implode your balloon about me thinking I am absolutely right. I am right to the extent that experience has proven my words correct. Beyond that all my words are qualified. I have never claimed absolute authority on any point. > You are just an organism > and your reason has its limitations and my friend whatever you are asserting > with so much authority could all be so much bull-shit. That is true. I could be all so much bullshit. But I don't think so. I've had sufficient response to my words and thoughts to know they have basis and validity in reality. > You have failed to > understand whatever I have been saying and I can't give you understanding. > As I said earlier intelligence is in a particular sphere relevant to an > individual. And my friend this does not seem to be your sphere. And I do believe intelligent conversation, discussion and even argument are well beyond the sphere you inhabit. Unless you can respond with civility and rational discourse I'll not be responding further. I think you have shown your true colors here and in other ME forums.
