Thank you for taking the time and effort to explain this further,
Molly. I heard this advice years ago- how thought can actually
redirect behavior and response- maybe it included the establishment of
new brain neural pathways, as well. It is a task...

My feelings seem to exist in my heart and breast- other times the back
of my knees or feet. :-) Seriously, I do try to line up an attitdue
each day with a meditation. Also, am finding it's easier to read
complicated paragraphs the last few months and think it may be because
I no longer drink and synapses are shaking hands once again- I hope!

Sorry, but I am with Gloria Steinem on the 70's as a point of taking
death seriously at last no matter how one looks or feels or any other
measurement. I just think it is ludicrous to talk of new beginnings! I
haven't even resolved the past!!!

Am happy the painters are doing great and soon will be done with the
trim. They are friends of my youngest son and I treat them to a huge
lunch but it won't affect their wages plus will give them some sockeye
salmon my son sent down form AK. They are a relief after that
carpenter! See what I mean? :-)

On Aug 31, 9:24 am, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
> so as to remain succinct with the banks model, thoughts or systems of
> thought: 'The existence of a personal thought system, or “ego”—which
> we see as simply being a sticky attachment to, or identification with
> thoughts—trips up our noble aspirations for peace. Yet we have found
> that teaching people about the neutral fact of Thought, and how it
> creates reality for each of us (rather than attempting to change
> “content”), allows people to shine the light of this principle on all
> their thinking. Levels of consciousness jump as people gain
> understanding about the formless source of all ideas, beliefs and
> opinions." (taken from the original post.)  So yes, systems of thought
> would include concepts, rational systems of thought etc. All of the
> noise, color and emotion that runs through us daily.  We are aware of
> it, and participate in it and organize it to varying degrees,
> depending on our character.
>
> Banks likens consciousness to a canvas, or medium of expression; mind
> as the brush that moves to create the form, thought.  If you look at
> that painting of your life right now, do you like it?  Do you feel you
> have the freedom to start over, and paint another if you don't?
> Consciousness gives us experience.  We CAN experience the infinite,
> only if we shed ourselves of our limited thoughts and allow our minds
> to flow freely. (in this analogy)
>
> If you find yourself (in your thoughts) finding fault, recognizing
> what you don't like, thinking yourself in opposition to the world, you
> are painting your life with limitation, your mind and consciousness
> will respond to give you that experience.  Many people don't like this
> idea - it leaves no one to blame.  But the truth is, our direct
> experience is a result of our internal environment, how we hold our
> thoughts, mind and consciousness.  Not to say if we want a car and
> think of a car we get a car.  That's baloney.  Good houskeeping in
> your internal environment brings you a state of being, non possessing
> (ego limited.) The good news, is the process is responsive and
> forgiving.  We can always start again with a clean canvas, or board,
> or monitor, or stretch of infinite space.
>
> Our filters "ego, idea, philosophies, emotion," do make us unique.  We
> all have potentiality and we are all realized to relative degrees as
> long as we live.  Our highest potential changes with the greater
> realization of our life, or as we look away and deny it.  It is not a
> fixed point, it changes as we change.  But it IS unilimited, because
> the possibility within consciousness is infinite.
>
> I like the banks model for its simplicity: mind, consciousness,
> thought.  I have seen a great deal of rhetoric about the interplay of
> the three, and though this model one of the most easily understood.
>
> On Aug 30, 7:12 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Do you mean belief systems? This could get quite complicated! What if
> > our "filters" make us unique? Do you mean happiness by "our highest
> > potential"?
>
> > On Aug 30, 11:24 am, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I think we proceed along with everything else in our lives, not
> > > despite of it.  We have thoughts about everything that comes into our
> > > experience.  We proceed to observe those thoughts and reformulate our
> > > systems and filters while we are experiencing.  We don't have to go
> > > into hermitage to determine what our highest potential is.  We just
> > > need to ask ourselves what the best life for us would be (not a fixed
> > > point) and then keep our thoughts, mind and consciousness aligned to
> > > it.  We all fall out.  We all realign.  Life goes on.
>
> > > On Aug 30, 12:13 pm, ashok tewari <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > " ...  systems that create lives better aligned with our highest 
> > > > potential
> > > > ... "
>
> > > > Molly, I'm sure it's the easiest thing to do, in Banks' and your own 
> > > > view,
> > > > but may not be for the rest of us.
>
> > > > 01  Before aligning our lives ... we need to know : along what ?  What 
> > > > is my
> > > > " highEST potential ?" Do you know, or can explain, since I may not ?
>
> > > > 02  Such aligning is not the only job before us ... much of it still
> > > > survival, before most of us. It has its own demands that displace 
> > > > everything
> > > > else !
>
> > > > So, how do take hold of ourselves in accord with Banks' suggestions ?
>
> > > > This an invitation for you take centre stage and let us know how we all
> > > > could proceed, despite everything else in our lives.
>
> > > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > looking at the Banks models, I would say that Mind, as shared wisdom;
> > > > > Consciousness, as shared experience; and Thought as compassion or love
> > > > > can all create shared culture of great value. Of course, in duality,
> > > > > the opposite aspects of culture can also be created.
>
> > > > >  Banks seems to be saying in this simply synopsis of his three
> > > > > principals, that thought creates the form of our experience, and we
> > > > > have thoughts beyond our own personal thought systems (egos that
> > > > > include identification and attachment), common thoughts about life
> > > > > that pertain to all.  The simple exercise of examining our own
> > > > > thoughts, finding their origin, filtering, housekeeping, letting go of
> > > > > self defeating thoughts - this is one of the first and most important
> > > > > practices used for knowing ones self.  If we can originate and
> > > > > organize our thoughts into systems that create lives better aligned
> > > > > with our highest potential,  (that aspect within us we need to explore
> > > > > and become intimately familiar with), what how we live with mind and
> > > > > consciousness will also change immeasurably.
>
> > > > > I will note that this simple exercise can take a lifetime to master,
> > > > > but is ultimately worth trying - like learning language and reading.
>
> > > > > On Aug 29, 2:03 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > A lot can happen to a human being to derail this view- optimistic as
> > > > > > it is, Molly. At any rate between you and Slip I was reminded of 
> > > > > > Emily
> > > > > > Dickinson's poem, as follows:
>
> > > > > > I'm Nobody! Who are you?
> > > > > > Are you- Nobody- Too?
> > > > > > Then there's a pair of us?
> > > > > > Don't tell! they'd advertise- you know!
>
> > > > > > How dreary- to be- Somebody!
> > > > > > How public-like a Frog-
> > > > > > To tell one's name- the livelong June-
> > > > > > To an admiring Bog!                              c.1861
>
> > > > > > How do the values and expectations of a culture shape what is 
> > > > > > expected
> > > > > > of an individual and what happens when there is a dramatic turn of
> > > > > > events? Is ego strength "fixed" to cope or does it have "limits", 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > latter which might explain many behaviors. I can think of such
> > > > > > stresses and imagine you can, as well.
>
> > > > > > On Aug 26, 8:56 am, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Mind: All human beings share in being a part of, and connected to
> > > > > > > Mind, the universal Life energy and source of intelligence beyond 
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > brain. Because of Mind, we share in an endless flow of 
> > > > > > > wisdom—each of
> > > > > > > us equally capable of being wise.
>
> > > > > > > Consciousness: All human beings share in the principle or fact of
> > > > > > > Consciousness. We experience life. We also experience life from
> > > > > > > different levels of consciousness—from truncated and fear-based, 
> > > > > > > angry
> > > > > > > and insecure “levels” to grounded, secure, safe, wise and even
> > > > > > > enlightened states (Buddha Mind, Christ Consciousness, the “Father
> > > > > > > within,” the Kingdom of Heaven.) If humans lived even a little 
> > > > > > > more
> > > > > > > often in this last state of mind, the impact on world peace, from 
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > personal to a global level, would be significant.
>
> > > > > > > The principle of Thought, as a universal function, guides humans
> > > > > > > either toward or away from non-violence, love and compassion. The
> > > > > > > existence of a personal thought system, or “ego”—which we see as
> > > > > > > simply being a sticky attachment to, or identification with 
> > > > > > > thoughts—
> > > > > > > trips up our noble aspirations for peace. Yet we have found that
> > > > > > > teaching people about the neutral fact of Thought, and how it 
> > > > > > > creates
> > > > > > > reality for each of us (rather than attempting to change 
> > > > > > > “content”),
> > > > > > > allows people to shine the light of this principle on all their
> > > > > > > thinking. Levels of consciousness jump as people gain 
> > > > > > > understanding
> > > > > > > about the formless source of all ideas, beliefs and opinions.
>
> > > > > > > When humans understand that a thought is just a thought, just a
> > > > > > > creation from formless energy, the iron grip the ego can have on 
> > > > > > > us
> > > > > > > begins to lessen. Lighter, gentler, more inspired feelings arising
> > > > > > > from impersonal, or universal thoughts create kind and selfless
> > > > > > > behaviors. We begin to realize we are so much more than our 
> > > > > > > limited
> > > > > > > thoughts. So much more than we ever “thought”! While respecting 
> > > > > > > our
> > > > > > > own and others’ traditions, cultures and preferences, we see 
> > > > > > > beyond
> > > > > > > the forms that humans have created—and to the deeper truth of our
> > > > > > > common divinity, our shared existence in universal Mind, 
> > > > > > > Consciousness
> > > > > > > and Thought … or in Life. From this vantage point, there is no 
> > > > > > > reason
> > > > > > > to argue, to fight, to hurt another. When I hurt you, I diminish 
> > > > > > > me.
>
> > > > > > > So, our personal answer is to share with people these simple
> > > > > > > principles that govern their states of mind. Because, beneath it 
> > > > > > > all,
> > > > > > > all humans are already wise, good, generous, kind and even
> > > > > > > enlightened. When the clouds of thought begin to part, they each 
> > > > > > > take
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to