I see you are still not getting the point. If any terroist first had nuclear weapons and by such I assume misslies. Then any launch will be easy enough for other powers to track down the launch site, then we hit them with our own misslies. The point is that if say the USA where attacked with nuclear misslies, they would retaliate in kind, as they must, I dare say the same is true for my goverment over here in the UK.
I doubt that Bin Laden wants to die, nor any top dog in any terrorist organisation, power being a corrupting influence and all that. Nope we can see that when we are hit by suicide bombers, these are normaly young easily infulenced people who have undergone an amount of good ole fashioned brain washing. Ahh the leaders though, nope I do not belive they would relish the idea of of being killed them selves. On Apr 14, 4:24 pm, Chuck Bowling <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:53 AM, [email protected] < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > Ohh my freind there is soooo much differance. Have we in retaliation > > for the twin towers flown any planes into any terroist buildings? > > No but we've flown quite a few Hawk missles into 'em. ;) > > > Will we if attack by nucleuar weapns retaliat with nuclear weaponms of our > > own? > > Tactical nuclear weapons can be as small as a couple of kilotons. Dropping a > bunker buster into a fortified cave in the side of a mountain would be a lot > easier than taking it down with a few hundred troops. > > If Chicago were nuked I can't imagine much outcry if we vaporized the side > of a mountain in retaliation... > > Can you now see the huuuuge differance? > > > > > You are correct terrorists seem to rejoice in the killing of the > > infidel, do you honestly belive they would rechoice in being nukked in > > their turn if they nuke us? > > If terrorist had the same type of economy and social structure that a nation > typically has then I would agree that nuclear weapons could be a deterrent. > But terrorist organizations don't have cities or central governments. They > are usually very decentralized and worry a lot less about assets being taken > out by a single bomb. In fact, I doubt that our biggest bomb would do much > more than put a minor dent into an organization like Bin Laden's which is > spread across most of the planet.
