Ash, as is obvious to most, gabby is attacking the person (http:// www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html#hominem ) rather than the ideas. That and a projection as to my theological stance which is clearly not one that I have ever said I identified with only leave one with a vague nausea and a hope to a return to something other than simple trolling.
I am quite happy that you found the core notions of the post to be of interest and/or use. As to a 'competing theory', that which is lacking as you so rightly address ...and for good reason... I wouldn't hold my breath. On Apr 30, 8:05 pm, Ash <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am sorry to disappoint you Ash, but there is no competing theories here. > > All is one. OM. > > Should I take this to mean that you have a conciliatory view on the proposed > views? That would be interesting, and someone should put forward the > potential argument behind it even if that's not what you're saying..
