On May 10, 2:59 am, the taoist shaman <[email protected]> wrote:
> u talk like yoda , yoda was F in sweet .
> '' i don't believe it ! " ----LUKE
>
> " mmm, that is why u fail . '' ---YODA
>
> freekin sweet , im sorry u can go on with your conversation now
>
> ps. che was originally a symbol but now how many people understand
> what he represented , could u make the same argument for jesus or the
> pentagram for that matter , or the white flag with a red cross sailed
> by columbus , or the imagery on the american dollar bill ?
>
>
>
> rigsy03 wrote:
> > I've changed my mind about Che. He is too transitory to be a symbol. A
> > t-shirt or poster does not a symbol make. :-)
>
> > On May 5, 2:29 pm, the taoist shaman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > the immage of chae is a good example
>
> > > On May 4, 10:23 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Given the current buzz...
>
> > > > I wonder about the debate to show the Crucifixion of Christ back in
> > > > the day. Was it considered too graphic? And think of the multitude of
> > > > images of Christ's face created by artists of many ages and cultures.
> > > > How does an image become a symbol? Of what?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
