Hi everybody! I just would like to ask you a question about images
since you are taking about images.
Do images mean the same thing to different people? Or everyone of us
sees those images in a different way? What do you think?
My regards, Menfranco

On May 16, 6:39 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just settling in to a new attempt on the great work Chris.
> There are fantastic images in glaciers - natural products that
> resemble 'our worst fears'.
>
> On May 11, 2:15 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Sorry- I clicked a blank "send"!
>
> > Jesus is also the man/god symbol- among others. I will have to keep re-
> > reading to see what arguments can be made but there is also the
> > personal to consider when discussing symbolism.
>
> > Strange co-incidence about Star Wars. I either donated or tossed a
> > huge cache of figures, etc. and my daughter gasped as I guess they are
> > quite hot on e-bay. I think I would get depressed seeing what's hot-
> > like Antiques Roadshow.
>
> > Anyway- amazing what technology has done re war- Earth Wars.
>
> > Symbols and language do play a huge role, don't they? How words are
> > distorted in meaning or motive,
>
> > On May 10, 2:59 am, the taoist shaman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > u talk like yoda , yoda was F in sweet .
> > > '' i don't believe it ! " ----LUKE
>
> > > " mmm, that is why u fail . '' ---YODA
>
> > > freekin sweet , im sorry u can go on with your conversation now
>
> > > ps.  che was originally a symbol but now how many people understand
> > > what he represented , could u make the same argument for jesus or the
> > > pentagram for that matter , or the white flag with a red cross sailed
> > > by columbus , or the imagery on the american dollar bill ?
>
> > > rigsy03 wrote:
> > > > I've changed my mind about Che. He is too transitory to be a symbol. A
> > > > t-shirt or poster does not a symbol make. :-)
>
> > > > On May 5, 2:29 pm, the taoist shaman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > the immage of chae is a good example
>
> > > > > On May 4, 10:23 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Given the current buzz...
>
> > > > > > I wonder about the debate to show the Crucifixion of Christ back in
> > > > > > the day. Was it considered too graphic? And think of the multitude 
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > images of Christ's face created by artists of many ages and 
> > > > > > cultures.
> > > > > > How does an image become a symbol? Of what?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to