Maybe it does come back to what you say – a crude neutralizing of equation. Maybe it is connected to the Golden Rule – do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Most other religions or philosophies have some similar sort of rule phrased a bit differently. If not connected to something prescribed then natural law really is about realigning a sense of acceptable power between people. Maybe as a species people do have an innate sense of acceptable power limits in that respect regardless of culture and history. I have sometimes wondered if my own tendency to not taking revenge is actually a behaviour or attitude in myself that makes me a bit defective in comparison to others.
On May 12, 1:35 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > I was reading about natural law..and a though came to my mind ...in > connection to revenge...and the concept of 'deserving' what someone > gets..recent example osama deserved to die for what he did...what i > mean is...is it natural...or universally presumed ...like in the > language to 'forgive' ...not give ...give back....give back what is > due...the same injury...i cant go into detail at the moment but this > what the jist is...is it a crude neutralising of equation...is that > what it all comes down to in simple terms
