Maybe you're right Allan; maybe "they" need to learn to make money legally, given the opportunity.
On Aug 14, 5:47 pm, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree watching the news, what is seemed too see is not angry people but > people intent on theft and distruction. That wouldmake it opertunistic and > people out of control.. > As I write this it seems they ar just following the example of the richer > people who steal blatennly from other whether legally of on the sly. > Allan > I have to figure out how to get a spell checker > On Aug 14, 2011 6:38 PM, "paradox" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I think this recent sporadic widespread looting appeared a lot more > > serious and substantive that it actually was, though it could quite > > easily have gotten out of control; that in mind, i think it was > > wrapped up very well, very quickly. There are underlying concerns > > about the buildup of socisl pressures and catalysts, but i'm not > > convinced that the two things are related other than in opportunistic > > timing. > > > On Aug 13, 12:42 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I've given up on my initial reactions- rubber bullets, deportation, > >> etc. Anyway, England no longer sends its miscreants to Australia! > >> China used to send upstarts to work the fields,etc. Evicting people > >> from their homes will clog the streets and create more problems. > > >> The reaction is fear of mob rule, injury/death, property loss and > >> damage. Also fear of gangs. > > >> Jail won't solve it. Re-education and economics will, but can't happen > >> overnight. Plus the way bankers and CEO's cause great damage yet get > >> off the hook doesn't help in a fair solution. > > >> For most- return of stolen property or payments for damages, working > >> to repair damge to property, period of probation and some kind of > >> group re-hab. Sweat and remorse. :-) > > >> We- the USA- have sent a policeman seasoned with our own riots- he > >> will have better ideas. > > >> , > > >> On Aug 12, 7:28 am, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > So as we should all know we have had quite a week of it here in the > >> > UK. Facebook and many other web places have been inundated with all > >> > sorts of sillyness. > > >> > Calls to bring back national service, calls to evict those found > >> > guilty of the rioting and looting, calls to stop their benifits. I > >> > have witnessed some of my good good friends spew out all mannor of > >> > sillyness in their anger. > > >> > I have procliamed in the past that all questions of morality are > >> > better served sans emotions and I see much this week that has only > >> > firmed this view. > > >> > In order to discover though the validity of this thought tell me do > >> > you agree, or not and why? People of ME sway my opinion with your > >> > wise words. > > >> > What good can come of deciding upon a course of action whilst holding > >> > onto your anger? > > >> > I ask of course as a self confessed recovered angry man.- Hide quoted > text - > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
