i havent had time to come and look for a month now i guess.... are we
reinventing ourselves?.... Is this a new ME..... as long as its ME.....

On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:16 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:

> A warm welcome is what I'd like to feel at the beginning. I would like to
> see this expressed in words of appreciation that I found it to the group and
> that I should look around to see if I'd like to stay and contribute to the
> group. I would like to see this expressed in an image that welcomes the
> colourfulness and diversity of each group member to the other. I would like
> to see my name and the group's name used in its openness towards individual
> interpretations - in its singular as well as its plural meaning, in its
> visibility as well as in its audibility. I would like to be informed about
> basic rules of interaction in a culture neutral, unbiased tone. I would
> behave accordingly.
>
> I do not wish to get reinfected with horror vacui suppression.
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I've reposted the Guidelines (Orn sent them to me.)  Let's put the
>> little push pin to it and make it a top discussion (how is that
>> done?)  Until we come up with new ones, having the ones we all know is
>> better than nothing.
>>
>> On Sep 30, 11:54 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > I've taken down the two fixed messages at the head of discussions.
>> > They had lost relevance and the link wasn't working.  We should really
>> > discuss what we want here as a group, so I'll invite suggestions
>> > here.  I never got used to new google groups myself, but I guess we
>> > should think on that as well.
>> >
>> > 1.I take it no one wants spam other than as a capital banning offence.
>> > 2. I'm much less concerned than rude words than most, but even I don't
>> > want to see them in personal attack or in torrents (boring).
>> > 3. Rules work best when they are tolerant.  Manners often aren't.
>> >
>> > So what would we want to see at the top of discussions?    I hope we
>> > don't have to make a big deal out of it, but let's see.
>>
>
>


-- 
EverComing

Reply via email to